Is this superposition state an eigenstate of J^2 and L * S?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether the given superposition state is an eigenstate of the operators J^2 and L * S, along with finding the corresponding eigenvalues. Participants suggest starting by applying the operator J^2 to the state vector, which involves expanding it using the definitions of angular momentum operators. The conversation also touches on the notation used for operators and vectors, highlighting a preference for clarity in mathematical representation. Overall, the key task is to analyze the action of the operators on the specified superposition state to confirm its eigenstate status. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving problems in quantum mechanics.
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Show that the following superposition state in the |l,m1;ms> basis:-(2/3)^1/2|1,-1;1/2> + (1/3)^1/2|1,0;-1/2> is an eigenstate of J^2 and L * S and determine the corresponding eigenvalues.

I have no clue how to start this. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you determine the action of the operators
\hat{\vec{J}}^{2} ,\hat{\vec{L}}^{2},\hat{\vec{S}}^{2}

on any eigenstate...?

Daniel.
 
First note that:

\hat{\mathbf {J}}^2=\hat{\mathbf {J}} \cdot \hat {\mathbf {J}}=(\hat{\mathbf {L}} + \hat{\mathbf {S}}) \cdot (\hat{\mathbf {L}} + \hat{\mathbf {S}}) =\hat{\mathbf {L}}^2 + \hat{\mathbf {S}}^2+2 \hat{\mathbf {L}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf {S}}

Hit each term of your state vector with it.

edit: Bloody dexter, his LaTeX is faster than mine. :-p
 
Last edited:
I used "hats" for operators,that's a reason for envy...:wink: :-p

Daniel.

P.S.BTW,i resent the boldface notation of vectors... :-p
 
Last edited:
Nothing a quick edit can't fix. Now my operators don't have cold heads. :smile:
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
900
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K