MHB Is this the correct way to rewrite absolute value statements?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion confirms that the absolute value expressions for the given statements are correct. The distance between two points can be expressed in either order, as shown by the property that |x| = |-x|. The participants validate the expressions for distances involving x and constants, including x^3 and -1. They also agree that all rewritten statements accurately represent the original conditions. Overall, the rewrites are deemed correct and consistent with mathematical principles.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The distance between x and 4 is at least 8.

| x - 4 | > or = 8

Can this also be expressed as | 4 - x | > or = 8?

If so, why?

2. The distance between x^3 and -1 is at most 0.001.

| x^3 -(-1) | < or = 0.001

Can this also be expressed as | - 1 - x^3 | < or = 0.001?

3. The distance between x and 1 is less than 1/2.

| x - 1 | < 1/2

4. The distance between x and 1 exceeds 1/2.

| x - 1 | > 1/2

Is any of this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The distance between x and 4 is at least 8.

| x - 4 | > or = 8

Can this also be expressed as | 4 - x | > or = 8?

If so, why?

Your expressions are correct, and the reason you can express it either way is:

$$|-x|=|x|$$

The distance between 4 and x is the same as the distance between x and 4.

RTCNTC said:
2. The distance between x^3 and -1 is at most 0.001.

| x^3 -(-1) | < or = 0.001

Can this also be expressed as | - 1 - x^3 | < or = 0.001?

Yes, and you could even write:

$$\left|x^3+1\right|\le0.001$$

RTCNTC said:
3. The distance between x and 1 is less than 1/2.

| x - 1 | < 1/2

Correct. :D

RTCNTC said:
4. The distance between x and 1 exceeds 1/2.

| x - 1 | > 1/2

Is any of this correct?

It all looks good to me. (Yes)
 
Correct to me means I understood the textbook lecture.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top