MHB Is this the simplified form of (a + b)^3 - 8c^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on factoring the expression (a + b)^3 - 8c^3 as a difference of cubes. Participants confirm that the expression can be rewritten as (a + b)^3 - (2c)^3. The difference of cubes formula is applied, leading to the factorization (a + b - 2c)((a + b)^2 + 2c(a + b) + 4c^2). Clarifications are made regarding the interpretation of -8c^3, emphasizing that it can be expressed as -(2c)^3. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the correct application of the difference of cubes formula.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor (a + b)^3 - 8c^3.

Is this the difference of cubes?

Formula:

x^3 - a^3 = (x - a)(x^2 + ax + a^2)

Let x = (a + b)

Let a = 8

(a + b - 8)((a + b)^2 + 8(a + b) + 64)

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by writing the expression as the difference of cubes:

$$(a+b)^3-8c^3=(a+b)^3-(2c)^3$$

Now apply the difference of cubes formula...:D
 
Why did you write -8c^3 as -(2c)^3?

The number 8 is not part of c^3.

Are you saying that -8•c^3 = (-8c)^3?
 
RTCNTC said:
Why did you write -8c^3 as -(2c)^3?

The number 8 is not part of c^3.

Are you saying that -8•c^3 = (-8c)^3?

I applied the exponential property:

$$x^ny^n=(xy)^n$$

Since $8=2^3$, we can write:

$$8c^3=2^3c^3=(2c)^3$$
 
I got it now.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
765
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top