- #36
nightingale
- 53
- 1
Chestermiller said:Both the viscous stress and the turbulent stress you calculated are on a surface of constant r in the z direction, but also on a surface of constant z in the r direction.
Your questions are indicating that your fundamental understanding of turbulence and turbulent stresses needs beefing up. You need to understand the fundamentals before you start trying to apply it to problems. I'm going to recommend another book that I hold in high regard, and hope you will consider using it: Transport Phenomena by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot, Chapter 5. Physics Forums is just not structured to present a complete primer on Turbulent Flow.
Chet
Thank you Sir.
I have borrowed the book you recommend and read chapter 5 and chapter 1 which talk about kronecker delta. I really helps me to understand turbulence better.
I'm still intrigued on why Pope (2000) simply said VT as 'eddy viscosity' when it is, I think, 'kinematic eddy viscosity' but I decided I'll ask my teacher next time I met her.
I now know that the formula I should be using is:
-ρu'v' = μT * dU/dy
Where the μT here is the eddy viscosity.
Earlier the turbulent shear stress is:
τ = -ρu'v'
τ = - 1.2 * ((0.0625)(0.3125)+(0.4625)(0.1125)+(0.5624)(-0.2875)+...)/8
τ = 0.11343
and the velocity gradient is 0.4219
Thus the eddy viscosity is:
0.11343 = μ * 0.4219
μ = 0.27
Did I do right? Thank you very much.