MHB Is x+1 a Factor of the Polynomial x^3-5x^2+3x+1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining if x+1 is a factor of the polynomial x^3-5x^2+3x+1 using the factor theorem and synthetic division. Synthetic division shows that the remainder when evaluating the polynomial at x=-1 is -8, indicating that x+1 is not a factor. The roots of the polynomial are found to be 2-√5, 1, and 2+√5, confirming that x+1 does not yield a zero. The conclusion is that x+1 is not a factor of the given cubic polynomial.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Use factor theorem and syntheitc division and its conjugate to decide whether the second polynomial is a factor of the first
$x^3-5x^2+3x+1;\quad x+1$
\item \textit{apply synthetic division}
\item$\begin{array}{c|rrrrr}
1 &1 &-5 &3 &1\\
& &1 &-4 &-1\\
\hline &1 &-4 &-1 &0
\end{array}$
$(x-1)$ so $x^2-4x-1$
$\begin{array}{rl}
x &=\dfrac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\\
\textsf{a,b,c} &=\dfrac{-(-4)\pm\sqrt{(-4)^2-4(1)(-1)}}{2(-1)}
=\dfrac{4\pm\sqrt{20}}{-2}
=\dfrac{4\pm 2\sqrt{5}}{2}
=2+\sqrt{5}\\
\textsf{hence} &x=1,-1,2+\sqrt{5}
\end{array}$

my first pass thru this...
actually I didn't get what the conjugate thing was about?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zeros of $f(x) = x^3 -5x^2 + 3x + 1$ are $x \in \{ 2- \sqrt{5}, 1 , 2+\sqrt{5} \}$

Code:
-1]  1  -5  3   1
        -1  6  -9
------------------
     1  -6  9  -8

$f(-1) = -8 \implies (x+1)$ is not a factor of the cubic polynomial
 
If I wanted to determine whether or not x+ 1 is a factor of $x^3- 5x^2+ 3x+ 1$ I would simply observe that when x= -1, $(-1)^3- 5(-1)^2+ 3(-1)+ 1= -1- 5- 3+ 1= -9+ 1= -8$. Since that is not 0, no, x+1 is NOT a factor of $x^3- 5x^2+ 3x+ 1$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top