Is $y=x^2$ Equivalent to Specific Modular Conditions?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Conditions
In summary: Simplifying, we get $y = x^2$. Therefore, $y=x^2$ if the conditions hold. In summary, we proved the lemma by showing that the given conditions imply $y=x^2$ and that $y=x^2$ implies the given conditions.
  • #1
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
5,049
7
Hey! :eek:

I want to prove the following lemma:

Let $n>1$. We suppose that the integers $x$ and $y$ satisfy the relations $x \mid_n 1$ and $y \mid_n 1$. Then $y=x^2$ if and only if the following conditions hold:
  1. $2nx+1 \mid_n 4n^2y-1$
  2. $2nx-1 \mid_n 4n^2y-1$
  3. $ny-kx \mid_n nx-k$, for each $k$ with $|k|<n$.


We have that $$K \mid_n M \leftrightarrow \exists q, f \in \mathbb{Z} : M=Kqn^{-f}$$
I have done the following:

$\Rightarrow : $

If $y=x^2$ we have that $$4n^2y-1=4n^2x^2-1=(2nx-1)(2nx+1)$$ Therefore, $2nx-1 \mid_n 4n^2y-1$ and $2nx+1 \mid_n 4n^2y-1$.

In addition we have that $$ny-kx=nx^2-kx=x(nx-k)$$ So, $ny-kx \mid_n nx-k$.

Is this correct? Do we not use the conditions $x \mid_n 1$ and $y \mid_n 1$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello,

Your proof is correct so far. However, we do not need to use the conditions $x \mid_n 1$ and $y \mid_n 1$ to prove this lemma. These conditions are given in the problem statement and do not play a role in the actual proof.

To complete the proof, we need to show the reverse implication, $\Leftarrow$.

$\Leftarrow : $

Suppose the conditions hold, i.e. $2nx+1 \mid_n 4n^2y-1$, $2nx-1 \mid_n 4n^2y-1$, and $ny-kx \mid_n nx-k$ for all $k$ with $|k|<n$.

From the first two conditions, we can write:
$$4n^2y-1 = (2nx+1)(2nx-1)q_1$$
where $q_1 \in \mathbb{Z}$. Expanding this equation, we get
$$4n^2y-1 = 4n^2x^2q_1 + 2nx(q_1-1) - q_1$$
Since $y \mid_n 1$, we have $4n^2y-1 \mid_n 4n^2x^2q_1 + 2nx(q_1-1) - q_1$. This means that $4n^2x^2q_1 + 2nx(q_1-1) - q_1 = 0$.

Similarly, from the third condition, we can write:
$$nx-k = (ny-kx)q_2$$
where $q_2 \in \mathbb{Z}$. Rearranging this equation, we get
$$y = \frac{kx+nq_2}{n}$$
Since $x \mid_n 1$, we have $y \mid_n \frac{k+nq_2}{n}$. This means that $y = \frac{k+nq_2}{n}$ for some $k$ with $|k|<n$.

Putting these two equations together, we get:
$$y = \frac{k+nq_2}{n} = \frac{4n^2x^2q_1 + 2nx(q_1-1) -
 

FAQ: Is $y=x^2$ Equivalent to Specific Modular Conditions?

What are the conditions that we do not use in scientific experiments?

The conditions that are not used in scientific experiments are often referred to as "control conditions." These are the variables that are kept constant throughout the experiment in order to isolate the effects of the independent variable being tested.

Why do we not use certain conditions in scientific experiments?

We do not use certain conditions in scientific experiments in order to ensure that the results we obtain are valid and reliable. By controlling for certain variables, we can determine the true impact of the independent variable on the outcome of the experiment.

How do we determine which conditions to control in an experiment?

The conditions that are controlled in an experiment are determined by the hypothesis being tested. The scientist must identify the independent variable and then decide which variables need to be controlled in order to accurately measure its effects.

Are there any exceptions to not using certain conditions in experiments?

There are some cases in which it may be necessary to manipulate or change certain conditions in an experiment. This is typically done when the conditions are essential to the hypothesis being tested or when it would be unethical or impossible to control them.

Can not using certain conditions affect the validity of scientific experiments?

Yes, not using certain conditions in an experiment can greatly impact the validity of the results. Without controlling for variables, it becomes difficult to determine the true cause and effect relationship between the independent and dependent variables. This can lead to inaccurate conclusions and potentially invalidate the entire experiment.

Back
Top