- #36
crxyem
- 8
- 0
I used the example of an apple just so we had something tangible to relate to, but it could be any type of object
With a few possible caveats, having a property is the same thing as belonging to a set.
Well, the caveats that I had in mind concern whether a property becomes a set or a class and the order of your language (what you can quantify over). But I'm not sure either is of any consequence here.Cane_Toad said:I don't know the convention, but I think a property would be more like a variable in a function, the possible values for which might be member or subset of some set.