Isolating a variable in an exponent

In summary, the conversation involved finding the value of x in the equation N=Noe-ux, where No=1.5, e is the elementary charge, u=-0.068, and x=0.07. The solution was found to be 1.221. The conversation then continued with the need to find x if u=-0.036, N=1.221, and No remains 1.5. The process involved using the formula ln(N/No)=-ux and taking the logarithm with base 1.6*10^-19. The final solution for x was found to be 0.132.
  • #1
thatguythere
91
0

Homework Statement


So I had to find out
N=Noe-ux
Where No=1.5,e is the elementary charge, u=-0.068 and x=0.07
I came to the answer 1.221

Now I need to find x if u =-0.036, N=1.221 and No remains 1.5

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I reduce the equation to the following

ln(N/No)=-ux

The problem is that when I plug my numbers from the original problem into this I end up getting the following

ln(1.221/1.5)=-(-0.068)x
-0.2058=0.068x
-3.02= x

This is clearly incorrect since I know x should be 0.07.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
thatguythere said:

Homework Statement


So I had to find out
N=Noe-ux
Where No=1.5,e is the elementary charge, u=-0.068 and x=0.07
I came to the answer 1.221
I get something different.

thatguythere said:
Now I need to find x if u =-0.036, N=1.221 and No remains 1.5
I'll assume u = -0.036 is a typo because it looks as though you want to use u = -0.068 again.

Just check your answer for N again, and see if that changes anything.
 
  • #3
My order of operations was wrong then?

So I get 1.273

Now -0.036 was NOT a typo, however I am ignoring it, as I am using the original numbers to try to figure out how to isolate x. However, when I plug this new number in, I still end up with x = -2.413 instead of 0.07 which it should be.
Clearly I am doing something very wrong and have no idea what.
 
  • #4
Let me illustrate step by step.

N=Noe-ux
N=1.5*1.6x10-19(0.068)(0.07)
N=1.5*0.0960.07
N=1.5*0.849
N=1.274

Now I try to reverse it to figure out how to isolate x, this is where I do something very wrong I believe.

N=Noe-ux
1.274=1.5*1.6x10-19(0.068)(x)
0.849=1.6x10-19(0.068)(x)
ln0.849=0.068x
-0.164=0.068x
-2.41=x

But we know x=0.07. I'm lost.
 
  • #5
thatguythere said:
My order of operations was wrong then?

So I get 1.273
Sorry, I mistook e as being the natural exponential 2.718...
We're supposed to be using [itex]e=1.602\cdot10^{-19}[/itex], right?

Using the figures:
[tex]N_0 = 1.5[/tex]
[tex]e=1.602\cdot 10^{-19}[/tex]
[tex]u=-0.068[/tex]
[tex]x=0.07[/tex]

You should get [itex]N\approx 1.22[/itex]
 
  • #6
thatguythere said:
N=1.5*1.6x10-19(0.068)(0.07)
N=1.5*0.0960.07

How did you go from the first to the second step?
 
  • #7
I got it.
 
  • #8
Haha Ok so I was correct in the first place when I posted 1.221. Then I was trying to figure out what I did wrong which would explain your confusion over my next process.
 
  • #9
thatguythere said:
I did 1.6x10-19(0.068)
Is that improper order of operations?

Yes, it's not correct.

[tex](n\cdot a^b)^{cd} = n^{cd}\cdot a^{bcd}[/tex]

But you've done something else.
Of course, calculating them in this way is the long and inefficient way, so you'd instead enter it as so:

(1.6E-19)^(0.068*0.07)

EDIT: most of this is redundant, you already know it :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
thatguythere said:
Haha Ok so I was correct in the first place when I posted 1.221. Then I was trying to figure out what I did wrong which would explain your confusion over my next process.

Oh yeah sorry, that's my fault!

As for the second part of the problem where you're trying to find x, you've done essentially what confused me as well.

ln(N/No)=-ux

Remember that ln = loge is the natural logarithm, or in other words, it reverses the natural exponential operator.

If [itex]a=e^{b}[/itex] then [itex]\ln(a)=b[/itex] but we don't have the natural exponential (e=2.718...) here, we have another base altogether, so what we'd need to do to reverse the exponent operation is to take the log with base [itex]1.6\cdot 10^{-19}[/itex]

But your calculator probably doesn't have the option of choosing any base for the logarithm, so you instead use the formula

[tex]\log_ab=\frac{\log_cb}{\log_ca}[/tex]

So we have that

[tex]\log_{1.6\cdot 10^{-19}}(1.221/1.5) = \frac{\ln (1.221/1.5)}{\ln(1.6\cdot 10^{-19})}[/tex]
 
  • #11
Let me try then.
 
  • #12
Are you saying that
[itex]\frac{ln(1.221/1.5)}{ln(1.6E-19)}[/itex]=-ux?
 
  • #13
Yep!
 
  • #14
Yeah, I got that. So using -0.036, I come up with 0.132. Excellent.
 
  • #15
Thank you very much.
 
  • #16
You're welcome! And sorry about the confusion at the start.
 

FAQ: Isolating a variable in an exponent

How do I isolate a variable in an exponent?

To isolate a variable in an exponent, you need to use the inverse operation of the exponent. For example, if you have an equation like x^2 = 16, you can isolate the variable x by taking the square root of both sides. In this case, x = ±4.

What if the exponent is a fraction?

If the exponent is a fraction, you can use the nth root to isolate the variable. For instance, if you have an equation like x^(1/3) = 8, you can take the cube root of both sides to get x = 2.

Can I isolate a variable in an exponent if it is in the denominator?

Yes, you can still isolate a variable in an exponent if it is in the denominator. You just have to use the reciprocal of the exponent as the inverse operation. For example, if you have an equation like 1/x^2 = 4, you can flip both sides to get x^2 = 1/4, and then take the square root to get x = ±1/2.

Are there any other methods for isolating a variable in an exponent?

Yes, there are other methods such as using logarithms or rewriting the exponent in terms of a power. However, these methods are not as commonly used and may not always be applicable.

Can I isolate a variable if the exponent is a variable?

Yes, you can still isolate a variable in an exponent if the exponent itself is a variable. You just need to use the same inverse operation to both sides of the equation. For example, if you have an equation like x^y = 64, you can take the logarithm of both sides to get y = log(base x) 64.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
809
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
534
Back
Top