Its deciding which Stats method to use that the problem

In summary: In other words, if there are N samples, and each has a Bernoulli probability of occurrence (P1, P2, P3,...), then the binomial distribution will give the number of successes (N*P1+P2+P3), where each success is a sample with at least one bacterium. So, if you had N=10,000 and wanted to know the probability of at least 1 bacterium in 8 of those 10,000 samples, you would use the binomial distribution and find P=0.08. The Poisson distribution is just the Bernoulli distribution with rate = 0.5. In other words, if there are N samples, and each has a Po
  • #1
Prester John
3
0
Its deciding which Stats method to use that the problem...

Hello, i hope you don't mind a biologist interloping on your boards :)

I have a statistics problem that i could do with some help with if anyone can (please!).

I'm taking 2 8ml samples from a volume of 200mls. Distributed evenly within the 200mls may be bacteria. If a sample gets 1+ bacteria in then the sample is flagged as positive, if it get 0 bacteria it is flagged as negative. I don't know how many bacteria are in the 200mls or in the samples, only positive or negative.


To make it more interesting each 200ml volume may or may not contain bacteria (but if it does the number of bacteria is a constant value).

Now i have tested 20,000 lots of 200mls. Of these 10 have flagged positive. 5 of these were positive in both samples, 5 only in 1 sample. What i really want to know is how many i have missed.

I was thinking that you should be able to use the data showing 5 in 2 samples, 5 in 1 sample only to estimate the number of bacteria in a 200ml volume (? binomial dist or similar) and then use that to determine a probability that both samples will have no bacteria in them from a 200ml volume containing bacteria.

Thankyou for reading and i'll throw in a little irrelevant factoid for your amusal: Your body has on and in it 100 Trillion bacteria, that's 10x the number of cells that make you up
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Prester John said:
Thankyou for reading and i'll throw in a little irrelevant factoid for your amusal: Your body has on and in it 100 Trillion bacteria, that's 10x the number of cells that make you up
Does that include mitochondria?
 
  • #3
honestrosewater said:
Does that include mitochondria?

Not for the last billion years or so!
 
  • #4
How many what you have missed? 200 ml lots? Are you assuming that the test always gives the correct result for each 8 ml sample?

Without working this through, the number of bacteria in a volume of liquid should have a Poisson distribution. The samples of 8 ml would be described by a Bernoulli distribution. You need to find the parameter of the Poisson distribution, so you would find what parameter (for the Poisson distribution) would lead to the probability of at least 1 bacterium in 8 ml being equal to the sample proportion (15 out of 40,000). From this you could get a point estimate of the average # of bacteria in 200 ml, though I have no idea how accurate it would be.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Also, if you do it that way you would have to assume that the numbers of bacteria in each of the lots of 200 ml are identically and independently distributed. You'd have to assume that you're not taking half the lots from sterile distilled water and the other half from a pond.
 
  • #6
I was thinking it through over the weekend. If 50% of the time 1 out of 2 samples is positive, and 50% of the time 2/2 are positive does this imply that there are 3 "bacteria" per 16 ml sample ?
If there was 1 in 16 ml either or samples would be positive (never both)
If there was 2 per 16 ml the dist would be 2-0, 1-1, 0-2, leading to a distribution were 66%of the positives would have 1 sample positive, 33% in both samples
If there were 3 per 16ml he dist would be 3-0,2-1,1-2,0-3, ie 50% with 1 out of 2 samples positive, 50% with both samples positive?

(Assuming 100% detection of a "bacteria" in a sample)

Does that make sense?

Then assuming 3 "bacteria" per 16 ml (in a positive 200ml pool)its relativly easy to calculate the chance of not getting any bacteria in a 16ml sample??

I'll look up about the Bernoulli distribution and try to work it through that way. I know there are a lot of assumptions, some i know to be false but it is only the first attempt to assess the data. There are other data sets with different sample sizes etc that i can use this modelling to make predictions about.
 
  • #7
You don't really need to use the Bernoulli distribution, the main one for the way I suggested is the Poisson distribution. The Bernoulli distribution is just the binomial distribution with size = 1.
 

FAQ: Its deciding which Stats method to use that the problem

What does "deciding which Stats method to use" mean?

Deciding which Stats method to use refers to the process of selecting the most appropriate statistical method to analyze a given set of data.

Why is it important to choose the right Stats method?

Choosing the right Stats method is important because different methods are suited for different types of data and research questions. Using the wrong method can lead to incorrect conclusions and misleading results.

How do I determine which Stats method to use?

Determining which Stats method to use involves considering the type of data you have, the research question you are trying to answer, and the assumptions and limitations of each method. It may also be helpful to consult with a statistician or reference materials.

What are some common Stats methods used in scientific research?

Some common Stats methods used in scientific research include t-tests, ANOVA, regression analysis, and chi-square tests. The specific method used will depend on the type of data and research question.

Are there any resources available to help me choose the right Stats method?

Yes, there are many resources available such as textbooks, online tutorials, and statistical software packages that can assist in choosing the appropriate Stats method for your research. It is also recommended to seek guidance from a statistician or experienced researcher.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top