MHB Ivyrianne's question at Yahoo Answers regarding finding a circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the equation of a circle with its center on the line 4x + 3y = 2 and tangent to the lines x + y + 4 = 0 and 7x - y + 4 = 0. The center of the circle is represented by the parameters h and k, which satisfy the equation 4h + 3k = 2. By applying the distance formula for the tangents, two cases for the center are derived: h = -4, k = 6 with radius r = 3√2, and h = 2, k = -2 with radius r = 2√2. The resulting equations of the two circles are (x + 4)² + (y - 6)² = 18 and (x - 2)² + (y + 2)² = 8. The analysis concludes with a graphical representation of the circles and tangent lines.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Determine the equation of a circle having its center on the line 4x+3y=2?

continuation: and tangent to the line x+y+4=0 and 7x-y+4=0

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello again ivyrianne,

Let's let the equation of the circle be:

$$(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2$$

We have 3 parameters to determine: $h,k,r$.

In order for the center of the circle to lie on the line $4x+3y=2$, we require:

(1) $$4h+3k=2$$

Now, let's rewrite the tangent lines in slope-intercept form:

a) $$y=-x-4$$

b) $$y=7x+4$$

If we have a point $\left(x_0,y_0 \right)$ and a line $y=mx+b$, then the perpendicular distance $d$ from the point to the line is given by:

$$d=\frac{\left|mx_0+b-y_0 \right|}{\sqrt{m^2+1}}$$

You may find derivations of this formula here:

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f49/finding-distance-between-point-line-2952/

Using this formula for $d=r$ and the two tangent lines, we find that we require:

$$r=\frac{|-h-4-k|}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{|7h+4-k|}{5\sqrt{2}}$$

Using the definition $$|x|\equiv\sqrt{x^2}$$, we may square through and write:

$$\left(5(h+k+4) \right)^2=(7h-k+4)^2$$

Solving (1) for $k$, we find:

$$k=\frac{2-4h}{3}$$

Substituting, there results:

$$\left(5\left(h+\frac{2-4h}{3}+4 \right) \right)^2=\left(7h-\frac{2-4h}{3}+4 \right)^2$$

Combining like terms, we find:

$$\left(\frac{5}{3}(h-14) \right)^2=\left(\frac{5}{3}(5h+2) \right)^2$$

Hence, we must have:

$$(h-14)^2-(5h+2)^2=0$$

$$(6h-12)(-4h-16)=0$$

$$-24(h-2)(h+4)=0$$

$$h=-4,\,2$$

Case 1: $$h=-4$$

$$k=\frac{2-4(-4)}{3}=6$$

$$r=\frac{\left|-(-4)-4-6 \right|}{\sqrt{2}}=3\sqrt{2}$$

Case 2: $$h=2$$

$$k=\frac{2-4(2)}{3}=-2$$

$$r=\frac{\left|-2-4-(-2) \right|}{\sqrt{2}}=2\sqrt{2}$$

Thus, the two possible circles are:

$$\left(x+4 \right)^2+\left(y-6 \right)^2=18$$

$$\left(x-2 \right)^2+\left(y+2 \right)^2=8$$

Here is a plot of the three lines and the two circles:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1008._xfImport
 

Attachments

  • ivyrianne2.jpg
    ivyrianne2.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 114
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top