MHB Ivyrianne's question at Yahoo Answers regarding finding the height of a tree

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Tree
AI Thread Summary
To find the height of a tree located on a hillside, a problem involving a 40m high tower and angles of depression was discussed. The observer on the tower noted angles of 26 degrees to the top of the tree and 38 degrees to the bottom. Using trigonometric relationships, the height of the tree was derived through a series of equations involving the angles and distances. The final calculation, incorporating the given angles and height of the tower, resulted in an approximate tree height of 10.61 meters. This method effectively combines geometry and trigonometry to solve real-world problems involving elevation and distance.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

A 40m high tower stands vertically on a hill side (sloping ground) which makes an angle of 18 degrees with the?

con't; horizontal. A tree also stands vertically up the hill from the tower. An observer on top of the tower finds the angle of depression from the top of the tree to be 26deg & the bottom of the tree to be 38deg. Find the height of the tree.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello ivyrianne,

I would begin by drawing a diagram:

View attachment 999

$T$ is the height of the tower.

$x$ is the horizontal distance between the tower and the tree.

$a$ is the vertical distance between the bottom of the tower and the bottom of the tree.

$b$ is the vertical distance between the top of the tower and the top of the tree.

$h$ is the height of the tree.

$\theta$ is the angle of inclination of the hill.

$\alpha$ is the angle of depression from the top of the tower to the top of the tree.

$\beta$ is the angle of depression from the top of the tower to the bottom of the tree.

Now, from the diagram, we observe the following relationships:

(1) $$a+h+b=T$$

(2) $$\tan(\theta)=\frac{a}{x}$$

(3) $$\tan(\alpha)=\frac{b}{x}$$

(4) $$\tan(\beta)=\frac{h+b}{x}$$

Solving (1) and (4) for $h+b$ and equating, we find:

$$T-a=x\tan(\beta)$$

Solving (2) for $a$, and substituting into the above, we may write:

$$T-x\tan(\theta)=x\tan(\beta)$$

Solving this for $x$, there results:

(5) $$x=\frac{T}{\tan(\beta)+\tan(\theta)}$$

Now, solving (4) for $h$, we get:

$$h=x\tan(\beta)-b$$

Solving (3) for $b$ and substituting into the above, we get:

$$h=x\tan(\beta)-x\tan(\alpha)$$

$$h=x\left(\tan(\beta)-\tan(\alpha) \right)$$

Substituting for $x$ from (5), we find:

$$h=\left(\frac{T}{\tan(\beta)+\tan(\theta)} \right)\left(\tan(\beta)-\tan(\alpha) \right)$$

$$h=\frac{T\left(\tan(\beta)-\tan(\alpha) \right)}{\tan(\beta)+\tan(\theta)}$$

Plugging in the given data:

$$\theta=18^{\circ},\,\alpha=26^{\circ},\,\beta=38^{\circ},\,T=40\text{ m}$$

we have:

$$h=\frac{(40\text{ m})\left(\tan\left(38^{\circ} \right)-\tan\left(26^{\circ} \right) \right)}{\tan\left(38^{\circ} \right)+\tan\left(18^{\circ} \right)}\approx10.6147758253\text{ m}$$
 

Attachments

  • ivyrianne.jpg
    ivyrianne.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 318
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top