MHB Jesus' question at Yahoo Answers regarding finding total cost function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around formulating the total cost function for a pipeline from an oil refinery to storage tanks across a river. The problem involves calculating the lengths of the pipeline under the river and over land, with specific costs associated with each type of terrain. Using Pythagorean theorem, the lengths are expressed in terms of the distance from point P to the storage tanks. The total cost function is derived by substituting the lengths into the cost formula, resulting in a function that incorporates the costs per kilometer for both land and underwater sections. The final expression for the total cost function is presented as a simplified equation.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Function Math Question?

I am having a problem solving this question, any help is appreciated!

An oil refinery is located on the north bank of a straight river that is 2 km wide. A pipeline is to be constructed from the refinery to a point P on the south bank of the river, and then along the river to storage tanks on the south side of the river 6 km east of the refinery. The cost of laying pipe is $400,000 per km over land, and $800,000 per km under the river. Express the total cost of the pipeline as a function of the distance from P to the storage tanks.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Jesus,

I would first label some variables:

$$L_R$$ = the length of the pipeline under the river.

$$L_L$$ = the length of the pipeline over land. This is the variable with which we are to express the total cost function.

$$D$$ = the distance downriver the tanks are from the refinery.

$$W$$ = the width of the river.

$$C_R$$ = cost in dollars per unit length to lay pipe under the river.

$$C_L$$ = cost in dollars per unit length to lay pipe over the land.

Next, let's draw a diagram:

View attachment 1022

$R$ is the location of the refinery, and $T$ is the location of the tanks.

We see that by Pythagoras, we have:

$$L_R=\sqrt{\left(D-L_L \right)^2+W^2}$$

Now, the total cost is given by:

$$C=C_RL_R+C_LL_L$$

Substituting for $L_R$, we have:

$$C\left(L_L \right)=C_R\sqrt{\left(D-L_L \right)^2+W^2}+C_LL_L$$

Using the given data for the parameters:

$$C_R=800000,\,D=6,\,W=2,\,C_L=400000$$

we have:

$$C\left(L_L \right)=800000\sqrt{\left(6-L_L \right)^2+2^2}+400000L_L$$

Factoring and simplifying, we have:

$$C\left(L_L \right)=400000\left(2\sqrt{L_L^2-12L_L+40}+L_L \right)$$
 

Attachments

  • jesus.jpg
    jesus.jpg
    4.2 KB · Views: 100
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top