MHB Jimmy Mai's ODEs Questions at Yahoo Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving two initial value problems (IVPs) involving second-order differential equations. The first problem, x'' + 4x = 5sin(3t) with initial conditions x(0) = 0 and x'(0) = 0, yields the solution x(t) = (3/2)sin(2t) - sin(3t). The second problem, x'' + 25x = 90cos(4t) with initial conditions x(0) = 0 and x'(0) = 90, results in the solution x(t) = 2√(106)cos(5t - α) + 10cos(4t), where α = π - tan^(-1)(9/5). Both solutions exhibit a period of T = 2π, and the methodology includes finding homogeneous and particular solutions using the method of undetermined coefficients.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Differential Equation 3.6?

Express the solution of the given initial value problem as a sum of 2 oscillations. Throughout, primes denote derivatives with respect to time t. Graph the solution function x(t) in such a way that you can identify its period.

2. x"+4x=5sin3t x(0)=x'(0)=0

4. x"+25x=90cos4t x(0)=0 x'(0)=90

Answer is x(t)=3/2 sin2t-sin3t and

x(t)=2√(106) cos(5t-alpha) + 10cos4t with alpha=pi-inverse tan(9/5) = 2.0779

I have no idea how to do this type of problem. Thank you for your help.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Jimmy Mai,

2.) We are given the IVP:

$$x"+4x=5\sin(3t)$$ where $$x(0)=x'(0)=0$$

The first thing we want to do is find the associated homogeneous solution $$x_h(t)$$. We see that the characteristic equation is:

$$r^2+4=0$$

Thus, the characteristic roots are:

$$r=\pm2i$$

and so we may state:

$$x_h(t)=c_1\cos(2t)+c_2\sin(2t)$$

We may choose, using a linear combination identity, to write this solution as:

$$x_h(t)=c_1\sin\left(2t+c_2 \right)$$

Now, using the method of undetermined coefficients, we may look for a particular solution $$x_p(t)$$ of the form:

$$x_p(t)=A\sin(3t+B)$$

Differentiating twice with respect to $t$, we find:

$$x_p''(t)=-9A\sin(3t+B)$$

Substituting the particular solution into the original ODE, we may now determine the parameters $A$ and $B$:

$$\left(-9A\sin(3t+B) \right)+4\left(A\sin(3t+B) \right)=5\sin(3t)$$

$$-5A\sin(3t+B)=5\sin(3t+0)$$

Hence, we see that:

$$A=-1,\,B=0$$

and so:

$$x_p(t)=-\sin(3t)$$

By superposition, we may state the general solution to the ODE as:

$$x(t)=x_h(t)+x_p(t)=c_1\sin\left(2t+c_2 \right)-\sin(3t)$$

Now, to determine the solution satisfying the initial values, we need to differentiate the general solution with respect to $t$ to obtain:

$$x'(t)=2c_1\cos\left(2t+c_2 \right)-3\cos(3t)$$

Now we may write:

$$x(0)=c_1\sin\left(c_2 \right)=0$$

$$x'(0)=2c_1\cos\left(c_2 \right)-3=0$$

From these equations, we may observe that $c_1\ne0$, and so we have:

$$c_1=\frac{3}{2},\,c_2=0$$

Thus, the solution satisfying the IVP is:

$$x(t)=\frac{3}{2}\sin(2t)-\sin(3t)$$

A plot of the solution shows its period is $T=2\pi$:

View attachment 907
 

Attachments

  • jimmymai1.jpg
    jimmymai1.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 104
4.) We are given the IVP:

$$x"+25x=90\cos(4t)$$ where $$x(0)=0,\,x'(0)=90$$

As before, we first want to find $x_h(t)$. We see the associated characteristic equation is:

$$r^2+5=0$$

and so:

$$r=\pm5i$$

Thus, the homogeneous solution may be written:

$$x_h(t)=c_1\cos\left(5t+c_2 \right)$$

Next, we may use undetermined coefficients to find a particular solution of the form:

$$x_p(t)=A\cos(4t+B)$$

Differentiating twice with respect to $t$, we find:

$$x_p''(t)=-16A\cos(4t+B)$$

Substituting into the original ODE, we find:

$$\left(-16A\cos(4t+B) \right)+25\left(A\cos(4t+B) \right)=90\cos(4t)$$

$$9A\cos(4t+B)=90\cos(4t+0)$$

From this we determine:

$$A=10,\,B=0$$

and so we have:

$$x_p(t)=10\cos(4t)$$

By superposition, we may the give the general solution to the ODE as:

$$x(t)=x_h(t)+x_p(t)=c_1\cos\left(5t+c_2 \right)+10\cos(4t)$$

Now, to determine the solution satisfying the initial values, we need to differentiate the general solution with respect to $t$ to obtain:

$$x'(t)=-5c_1\sin\left(5t+c_2 \right)-40\sin(4t)$$

Now we may write:

$$x(0)=c_1\cos\left(c_2 \right)+10=0$$

$$x'(0)=-5c_1\sin\left(c_2 \right)=90$$

Solving both for $c_1$, we find:

$$c_1=-\frac{10}{\cos\left(c_2 \right)}=-\frac{18}{\sin\left(c_2 \right)}$$

$$5\sin\left(c_2 \right)=9\cos\left(c_2 \right)$$

$$\tan\left(c_2 \right)=\frac{9}{5}$$

$$c_2=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{9}{5} \right)$$

$$c_1=-\frac{10}{\cos\left(\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{9}{5} \right) \right)}=-2\sqrt{106}$$

Thus we may state the solution satisfying the given IVP is:

$$x(t)=-2\sqrt{106}\cos\left(5t+\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{9}{5} \right) \right)+10\cos(4t)$$

Using the identity $$\cos(\theta-\pi)=-\cos(\theta)$$, we may write this solution as:

$$x(t)=2\sqrt{106}\cos\left(5t-\left(\pi-\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{9}{5} \right) \right) \right)+10\cos(4t)$$

A plot of the solution shows its period is $T=2\pi$:

View attachment 908
 

Attachments

  • jimmymai2.jpg
    jimmymai2.jpg
    9.2 KB · Views: 101
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top