MHB JOHN's question at Yahoo Answers involving Lagrange multipliers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on maximizing the cross-sectional area of a rectangular beam cut from an elliptical log with semiaxes of 2 feet and 1 foot using Lagrange multipliers. The objective function for the area is defined as A(x,y) = 4xy, subject to the constraint g(x,y) = x^2 + 4y^2 - 4 = 0. By applying Lagrange multipliers, the equations lead to the relationship x^2 = 4y^2, which is then substituted back into the constraint to find y^2 = 1/2. Ultimately, this results in a maximum area of 4 ft² for the rectangular cross-section of the beam. This method demonstrates the application of optimization techniques in calculus.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calc 3 Lagrange multiplier question?

What is the maximal cross-sectional area of a rectangular beam cut from an elliptical log with semiaxis of length 2 feet and 1 foot?

I need help on applying the method of lagrange to this scenario. Thank you

Here is a link to the question:

Calc 3 Lagrange multiplier question? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello JOHN,

I would choose to orient my coordinate axes such that the origin coincides with the center of the elliptical cross-section of the log, where all linear measures are in ft. Now looking only at the first quadrant, let's let the upper right vertex of the cross section of the rectangular beam be at $(x,y)$. Hence, adding the other 3 quadrants, we find the area of this rectangular cross-section, i.e., our objective function is:

$$A(x,y)=4xy$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=x^2+4y^2-4=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$4y=\lambda(2x)$$

$$4x=\lambda(8y)$$

Solving both for $\lambda$, and equating, we find:

$$\lambda=\frac{4y}{2x}=\frac{4x}{8y}$$

Simplifying, we find:

$$x^2=4y^2$$

Substituting this into the constraint, we find:

$$4y^2+4y^2=4$$

Solving for $y^2$, we find:

$$y^2=\frac{1}{2}$$

and since:

$$x=2y$$, as we have taken the positive root given the two variables are in the first quadrant, we find:

$$A_{\text{max}}=A(2y,y)=8y^2=8\cdot\frac{1}{2}=4$$

Hence, the maximal area of the rectangular cross-section of the beam is $4\text{ ft}^2$.

To JOHN and any other guest viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization with constraint problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top