MHB Jun's question via email about Laplace Transform

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the initial value problem for the differential equation using Laplace Transforms. The initial conditions provided are y(0) = 2 and y'(0) = 0. The Laplace Transform leads to the expression Y(s) = 2[s/(s^2 + 4) - 4e^(-6s)/(s(s^2 + 4))]. A key point raised is the potential need for an arbitrary constant due to the second-order nature of the problem, suggesting that the solution could contain an additional term. Ultimately, the solution is derived as y(t) = 2[cos(2t) + (cos(2(t - 6)) - 1)H(t - 6)], incorporating the necessary adjustments for the initial conditions.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
$\displaystyle y\left( t \right) $ satisfies the initial value problem

$\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{d}^2y}{\mathrm{d}t^2} + 4\,y= -8\,H\left( t - 6 \right) , \quad y\left( 0 \right) = 2 , \,\, y'\left( 0 \right) = 0$

Find the solution to the initial value problem using Laplace Transforms.

Upon taking the Laplace Transform of the equation we have

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} s^2\,Y\left( s \right) - s\,y\left( 0 \right) - y'\left( 0 \right) + 4\,Y\left( s \right) &= -\frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s} \\
s^2 \,Y\left( s \right) - 2\,s - 0 + 4\,Y\left( s \right) &= -\frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s}\\
\left( s^2 + 4 \right) Y\left( s \right) - 2\,s &= -\frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s} \\
\left( s^2 + 4\right) Y\left( s \right) &= 2\,s - \frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s} \\
Y\left( s \right) &= \frac{2\,s}{s^2 + 4} - \frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } \\
Y\left( s \right) &= 2 \left[ \frac{s}{s^2 + 4} - \frac{4\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } \right] \end{align*}$

The first term's Inverse Transform can be read off the tables. The second requires the second shift theorem: $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ f\left( t - a \right) \, H\left( t - a \right) \right\} = \mathrm{e}^{-a\,s}\,F\left( s \right) $.

$\displaystyle F\left( s \right) = \frac{4}{s\left( s^2 + 4 \right) }$

Applying Partial Fractions:

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{A}{s} + \frac{B\,s + C}{s^2 + 4} &\equiv \frac{4}{s\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } \\
A\left( s^2 + 4 \right) + \left( B\,s + C \right) s &\equiv 4 \end{align*}$

Let $\displaystyle s = 0 \implies 4\,A = 4 \implies A = 1$, then

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} 1\left( s^2 + 4 \right) + \left( B\,s + C \right) s &\equiv 4 \\
s^2 + 4 + B\,s^2 + C\,s &\equiv 4 \\
\left( B + 1 \right) s^2 + C\,s + 4 &\equiv 0\,s^2 + 0\,s + 4 \end{align*}$

It's clear that $\displaystyle B + 1 = 0 \implies B = -1$ and $\displaystyle C = 0$. Thus

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} F\left( s \right) &= \frac{1}{s} - \frac{s}{s^2 + 4} \\
f\left( t \right) &= 1 - \cos{ \left( 2\,t \right) } \\
f\left( t - 6 \right) \, H\left( t - 6 \right) &= \left\{ 1 - \cos{ \left[ 2 \left( t - 6 \right) \right] } \right\} \, H\left( t - 6 \right) \end{align*}$

So from our original DE

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} Y\left( s \right) &= 2 \left[ \frac{s}{s^2 + 4} - \frac{4\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } \right] \\
\\
y \left( t \right) &= 2\left[ \cos{ \left( 2\,t \right) } - \left\{ 1 - \cos{ \left[ 2\left( t - 6 \right) \right] } \right\} \, H\left( t - 6 \right) \right] \\
&= 2 \left[ \cos{ \left( 2\,t \right) } + \left\{ \cos{ \left[ 2\left( t - 6 \right) \right] } - 1 \right\} \, H\left( t - 6 \right) \right] \end{align*} $
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Was it given that ##y’(0)=0##? The second line after you apply the transform (the 0), I think this should be replaced by an arbitrary constant, say c? Try that. Since it’s a second order IVP with only one initial value given the solution should contain an unknown constant.

Here’s you work accounting for this constant up to a certain point with differences ##\boxed{\text{new term(s)}}##.

Your work:
Upon taking the Laplace Transform of the equation we have

$ \begin{align*} s^2\,Y\left( s \right) - s\,y\left( 0 \right) - y'\left( 0 \right) + 4\,Y\left( s \right) &=& -\frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s} \\ s^2 \,Y\left( s \right) - 2\,s - \boxed{c} + 4\,Y\left( s \right) &=& -\frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s}+\boxed{c} \\ \left( s^2 + 4 \right) Y\left( s \right) - 2\,s &=& -\frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s}+\boxed{c} \\ \left( s^2 + 4\right) Y\left( s \right) &=& 2\,s - \frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s}+\boxed{c} \\ Y\left( s \right) &=& \frac{2\,s}{s^2 + 4} - \frac{8\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } +\boxed{\frac{c}{s^2+4}} \\ Y\left( s \right) &=& 2 \left[ \frac{s}{s^2 + 4} - \frac{4\,\mathrm{e}^{-6\,s}}{s\left( s^2 + 4 \right) } + \boxed{\frac{c}{2(s^2+4)}} \right] \\ \end{align*}$
 
Last edited:
Sorry had latex problems, refresh the page. Simple from there, just take the inverse transform of the last boxed term. Should be ##c_1 \sin (2t)## where ##c_1 = \tfrac{c}{4}##. Got it from there?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top