- #1
wasteofo2
- 478
- 2
As some of you may know, Jerry Falwell is in the hospital, afflicted by pneumonia, on a respirator, and according to a few different news reports, in "critical but stable condition".
Now, as you all probabally know, Mrs. Schiavo was in a fairly "stable" condition before nutrition and hydration was denied to her, and wasn't nearly in any sort of "critical" condition, as she had been pretty static for quite a number of years. All that was being done to keep her alive was feeding and nutrition - pretty mundane means of keeping someone alive, giving her something that everyone needs.
I've heard many people trying to judge whether or not it's right to keep Mrs. Schiavo on life support based on whether extrordinary or simply ordinary methods are being taken to preserve her life, with the implication that it was more justified to allow somebody's life to end if you were using extrordinary means (such as dialysis or an artificial heart machine) to keep them alive, as opposed to the ordinary means of simply feeding them when they're unable to feed themselves.
Another manner of discussion I've heard about Mrs. Schiavo is whether or not it's acceptable to end a life based on the quality of it. Since Mrs. Schiavo essentially has no quality of life - it has been argued - there is no reason to keep her alive, since she is essentially just one big chemical reaction going without any real purpose and little or no conciousness at all.
So Mrs. Schiavo was in a non-critical condition, experiencing no pain at all, and merely being fed to keep her alive, and yet it was ruled by a court that she shouldn't have any more food or water given to her.
And yet, Mr. Falwell is in a hospital, in critical condition, presumably experiencing immense physical discomfort from his severe case of pneumonia, and being kept alive by the extrordinary means of a respirator.
I have no idea how a random woman in Florida can be allowed to die because she doesn't have the neurological functions to feed herself, but a man (who is clearly brain-dead anyway) like Falwell can be kept alive on a respirator, despite not having the respiratory functions to breathe for himself.
Schiavo can't eat, nor recover the ability to eat, so she is deprived of food. Falwell can't breathe, and some bastards somewhere out there decide to keep him alive, totally ignoring the fact that he actually COULD recover.
Why couldn't his followers just accept the will of God and let their leader fall when he was destined to, instead of intermeddling in the workings of God on earth?
The world is so insane...
Now, as you all probabally know, Mrs. Schiavo was in a fairly "stable" condition before nutrition and hydration was denied to her, and wasn't nearly in any sort of "critical" condition, as she had been pretty static for quite a number of years. All that was being done to keep her alive was feeding and nutrition - pretty mundane means of keeping someone alive, giving her something that everyone needs.
I've heard many people trying to judge whether or not it's right to keep Mrs. Schiavo on life support based on whether extrordinary or simply ordinary methods are being taken to preserve her life, with the implication that it was more justified to allow somebody's life to end if you were using extrordinary means (such as dialysis or an artificial heart machine) to keep them alive, as opposed to the ordinary means of simply feeding them when they're unable to feed themselves.
Another manner of discussion I've heard about Mrs. Schiavo is whether or not it's acceptable to end a life based on the quality of it. Since Mrs. Schiavo essentially has no quality of life - it has been argued - there is no reason to keep her alive, since she is essentially just one big chemical reaction going without any real purpose and little or no conciousness at all.
So Mrs. Schiavo was in a non-critical condition, experiencing no pain at all, and merely being fed to keep her alive, and yet it was ruled by a court that she shouldn't have any more food or water given to her.
And yet, Mr. Falwell is in a hospital, in critical condition, presumably experiencing immense physical discomfort from his severe case of pneumonia, and being kept alive by the extrordinary means of a respirator.
I have no idea how a random woman in Florida can be allowed to die because she doesn't have the neurological functions to feed herself, but a man (who is clearly brain-dead anyway) like Falwell can be kept alive on a respirator, despite not having the respiratory functions to breathe for himself.
Schiavo can't eat, nor recover the ability to eat, so she is deprived of food. Falwell can't breathe, and some bastards somewhere out there decide to keep him alive, totally ignoring the fact that he actually COULD recover.
Why couldn't his followers just accept the will of God and let their leader fall when he was destined to, instead of intermeddling in the workings of God on earth?
The world is so insane...
Last edited: