K-point mesh and Monkhorst-Pack

  • A
  • Thread starter ramana3797
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Quantum
In summary, the conversation was about a person who is an expert at summarizing content. They do not engage in conversations or answer questions, but only provide concise summaries of information. The instruction is to write a summary for the conversation and start the output with "In summary,".
  • #1
ramana3797
18
6
TL;DR Summary
I am confused as how these are used in VASP calculations
Are the K-point mesh and monkhorst pack same. I was reading research papers using VASP and in some papers as the number of cells increases the Monkhorst Pack increases but in others the K-Point mesh decreases.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

FAQ: K-point mesh and Monkhorst-Pack

What is a K-point mesh?

A K-point mesh is a grid of points in reciprocal space used in electronic structure calculations to sample the Brillouin zone. These points are used to approximate integrals over the Brillouin zone, which is crucial for calculating properties such as the electronic band structure and density of states in periodic systems.

What is the Monkhorst-Pack scheme?

The Monkhorst-Pack scheme is a method for generating a uniform grid of k-points in the Brillouin zone. It is designed to efficiently sample the reciprocal space by creating a mesh that is commensurate with the symmetry of the crystal lattice, thereby reducing the number of k-points needed for accurate calculations.

Why is the choice of K-point mesh important?

The choice of K-point mesh is important because it affects the accuracy and computational cost of electronic structure calculations. A denser K-point mesh typically leads to more accurate results but requires more computational resources. Conversely, a sparse K-point mesh may lead to inaccuracies in the calculated properties.

How do you determine the optimal K-point mesh for a calculation?

Determining the optimal K-point mesh involves balancing accuracy and computational cost. This is typically done by performing convergence tests, where calculations are repeated with increasingly dense K-point meshes until the results (e.g., total energy, band structure) converge to within a desired tolerance. The smallest mesh that achieves this convergence is considered optimal.

Can the Monkhorst-Pack scheme be used for all types of crystal lattices?

While the Monkhorst-Pack scheme is widely applicable, it is most effective for crystal lattices with high symmetry. For low-symmetry or complex structures, other methods such as the Gamma-centered grid or special k-point sets might be more appropriate. The choice of scheme depends on the specific characteristics of the crystal lattice being studied.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
783
Replies
3
Views
698
Replies
9
Views
749
Replies
6
Views
955
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top