MHB Kaska's question at Yahoo Answers involving related rates

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
AI Thread Summary
A lighthouse is located 170 feet from a shoreline, with a spotlight revolving at 12 revolutions per minute. The problem involves calculating the rate at which the spotlight moves along the shoreline when it is 11 feet from the closest point to the lighthouse. The correct formula derived for the speed of the spot is dx/dt = (ω/y)(y² + x²), where ω is the angular velocity and y is the fixed distance from the lighthouse. Substituting the values yields a result that aligns with the initial answer, confirming the calculation's accuracy without needing trigonometric functions. Understanding the relationship between the variables is crucial for solving related rates problems effectively.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus related rates question, Help please!?

A lighthouse is fixed 170 feet from a straight shoreline. A spotlight revolves at a rate of 12 revolutions per minute, (24 rad/min ), shining a spot along the shoreline as it spins. At what rate is the spot moving when it is along the shoreline 11 feet from the shoreline point closest to the lighthouse?

I got the answer: 4080π(sec(0.0646)^2) but it seems to be wrong, I don't understand what I am doing wrong, any help?

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus related rates question, Help please!? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kaska,

Let's generalize a bit and derive a formula we can then plug our data into.

The first thing I would do is draw a diagram:

View attachment 618

As we can see, we may state:

$\displaystyle \tan(\theta)=\frac{x}{y}$

Now, let's differentiate with respect to time $t$, bearing in mind that while $x$ is a function of $t$, $y$ is a constant.

$\displaystyle \sec^2(\theta)\cdot\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{1}{y} \cdot\frac{dx}{dt}$

Since we are being asked to find the speed of the spot, whose position is $x$, we want to solve for $\dfrac{dx}{dt}$:

$\displaystyle \frac{dx}{dt}=y\sec^2(\theta) \cdot\frac{d\theta}{dt}$

Let's let the angular velocity be given by:

$\omega=\dfrac{d\theta}{dt}$

and from the diagram and the Pythagorean theorem, we find:

$\displaystyle \sec^2(\theta)=\frac{x^2+y^2}{y^2}$

Hence, we have:

$\displaystyle \frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{\omega}{y}(y^2+x^2)$

Now we may plug in the given data:

$\displaystyle \omega=24\pi\frac{1}{\text{min}},\,y=170\text{ ft},\,x=11\text{ ft}$

$\displaystyle \frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{24\pi}{170}(170^2+11^2)\,\frac{\text{ft}}{\text{min}}=\frac{348252\pi}{85}\, \frac{\text{ft}}{\text{min}}$

This is equivalent to the answer you obtained (accounting for rounding), however we have done away with the need to use a trig. function.
 

Attachments

  • kaska.jpg
    kaska.jpg
    2.4 KB · Views: 142
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top