MHB Kim's Questions on Babylonian Method for Estimating Square Roots

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Babylonian method for estimating square roots, providing detailed calculations for specific examples. For square root 130, starting with an initial guess of 11.5, the estimate converges to approximately 11.4017542509914 after several iterations. For square root 115, using 10.7262 as a guess yields an estimate of about 10.7238055620816. Nails' estimate for square root 58, starting at 7.8, results in approximately 7.6179487 after one iteration. Lastly, estimating square root 75 from an initial guess of 8 gives a next estimate of 8.6875.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Can someone please help me everytime I turn these in I get them wrong.?

1.Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

2. Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

3. Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

4. If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Kim's questions at Yahoo! Answers regarding thethe Babylonian method for estimating square roots

Hello Kim,

The Babylonian method for approximating square roots is the recursive method given by:

Given:

$$x_0\approx\sqrt{k}$$

Then:

$$x_{n+1}=\frac{x_n^2+k}{2x_n}$$

where $k$ is the number for which we are approximating the square root.

So, armed with this formula, let's now answer the given questions:

1.) Fill in the missing info in the problem to find square root 130 by using the Babylonian method. Let 11.5 be your initial guess.

We will use 15 digits of precision here since it is not stated how many iterations to carry out:

$$x_0=11.5$$

$$x_1\approx11.4021739130435$$

$$x_2\approx11.4017542587143$$

$$x_3\approx11.4017542509914$$

$$x_4\approx11.4017542509914$$

Thus, with 15 digits of accuracy, we may state:

$$\sqrt{130}\approx11.4017542509914$$

2.) Use the Babylonian method for your next estimate of square root 115 by using 10.7262 as your guess what's your next result?

The next result here is approximately:

$$x_1=\frac{10.7262^2+115}{2\cdot10.7262}\approx10.7238055620816$$3.) Nails wants to use the Babylonia method to estimate square root 58 to the nearest hundredth her initial estimate is 7.8. What is her estimate after she correctly completes the Babylonian method once?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{7.8^2+58}{2\cdot7.8}=7.6\overline{179487}$$

4.) If you use the Babylonian method to estimate square root 75 to the nearest hundredth, starting with the estimate 8. What is the next estimate?

The next result here is:

$$x_1=\frac{8^2+75}{2\cdot8}=8.6875$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top