Kinetic energy in center of mass reference frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the kinetic energy of a two-mass system in both the center of mass (CM) reference frame and another inertial frame (S). It establishes that the kinetic energy in frame S can be expressed in terms of the kinetic energy in the CM frame plus a term related to the center of mass velocity. The key point is that if there are no external forces acting on the system, the velocity of the center of mass remains constant, confirming that the kinetic energy difference is a constant. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these concepts for problem-solving in physics, illustrating that the process of reasoning through questions can be beneficial for others. Overall, the interaction emphasizes the relationship between kinetic energy and reference frames in classical mechanics.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
In MIT OCW's 8.01 "Classical Mechanics" textbook, there is a derivation to show that change in kinetic energy is independent of the choice of relatively inertial reference frames.
Relevant Equations
##K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2##
Here is the relevant chapter.

Suppose we have two masses ##m_1## and ##m_2## interacting via some force, and two reference frames, ##S## and ##CM##. The ##CM## frame is the center of mass reference frame. The origin of this reference frame is at the location of the center of mass of the system.

The position of particle ##j## in frame ##S## is ##\vec{r}_j## and in frame ##CM## is ##\vec{r}_{j}'##.

We have

$$\vec{r}_j=\vec{r}_j'+\vec{r}_{cm}$$

$$\vec{v}_j=\vec{v}_j'+\vec{v}_{cm}$$

Kinetic energy in the CM frame can be shown to be

$$K_{cm}=\frac{1}{2}(m_1v_1'^2+m_2v_2'^2)=\frac{1}{2}\mu\vec{v}_{1,2}^2$$

where ##\mu=\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}## and ##\vec{v}_{1,2}=\vec{v}_1-\vec{v}_2##.

My question is about kinetic energy in frame ##S##.

We start with

$$K_S=\frac{1}{2}(m_1v_1^2+m_2v_2^2)$$

And after subbing in ##v_j^2=\vec{v}_j\cdot\vec{v_j}=(\vec{v}_j'+\vec{v}_cm)\cdot(\vec{v}_j'+\vec{v}_{cm})## we end up with

$$K_S=K_{cm}+\frac{1}{2}(m_1+m_2)v_{cm}^2$$

Now, if ##v_{cm}## is constant then ##K_S## differs from ##K_{cm}## by a constant.

But how do we know that ##v_{cm}## is constant?

After writing this up I think I figured out the answer.

There are no external forces on the system of two particles. Thus, the acceleration of the center of mass is zero. Thus the velocity of the center of mass is constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since I already solved the question, I think this question can be deleted.
 
zenterix said:
Since I already solved the question, I think this question can be deleted.
Why? This is not only about you. It's a good illustration of how one grapples with a question and reasons out the answer. Others might profit from it by seeing that, more often than not, getting to the answer is not as smooth a process as textbooks want us to believe.
 
  • Like
Likes sakib71, zenterix and MatinSAR
zenterix said:
Since I already solved the question, I think this question can be deleted.
You can also get the result without considering the CoM frame. If two inertial frames are related by some relative velocity ##\vec v##, then the KE of mass ##m_1## is related by:
$$KE_1' = \frac 1 2 m_1v_1'^2 = \frac 1 2 m_1|\vec v_1 +\vec v|^2$$$$= \frac 1 2 m_1(v_1^2 + 2\vec v_1\cdot \vec v + v^2)$$$$= KE_1 + \vec p_1 \cdot \vec v + \frac 1 2 m_1v^2$$Hence, the change in KE is:
$$\Delta KE_1' = \Delta KE_1 + \Delta \vec p_1 \cdot \vec v$$Hence, for a system of (any number of) particles:
$$\Delta KE' = \Delta KE + \Delta \vec P \cdot \vec v$$So, if the total momentum of the system is conserved (##\Delta \vec P = 0##), then the change in KE is independent of the inertial reference frame.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix and TSny
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top