A Klein paradox in the massless case

Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
I have a question about the Klein paradox in the massless case, for a potential step of height ##V_0## (this is exactly the situation described by Wikipedia). I don't have a problem to understand the "paradox", and I think the Wikipedia's illustration is quite telling.
My question is : what append at the limit case ##E_0 = V_0## ? The "wave function" after the step is constant (##k=0##), and the Dirac equation for the spinor's components ##\Psi_1##, ##\Psi_2## become ##0 = 0##... Thus there are no conditions for the value of those components. If I choose ##\Psi_1 = \Psi_2 = 1## for example, I still get ##T=1##. If I choose ##\Psi_1 = -\Psi_2 = 1##, I get ##R=1##. I "understand" this with the fact that at the node the group velocity is not defined.
So what would really happen in real life ?

400px-Dispersion1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit : By continuity of ##T(E)## I would say that the good answer is ##T=1##. Also if I end the step potential (I take a potential barrier), the electron coming from the left has to pass the barrier, as it can't change its group velocity. So for me ##T## is always ##1##, even in the pathological case ##E=V_0##.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top