Kruskal-Szekeres Radius: Explained for Beginners in GR

  • Thread starter smoothoperator
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Radius
In summary, the conversation discusses the Kruskal-Szekeres metric as an alternative coordinate system for the Schwarzschild metric. The Kruskal-Szekeres metric does not change the physical situation, as it is simply a different way of describing the same manifold. Proper distances between two points do not depend on the coordinate system chosen, as they are defined by the metric and not the coordinates.
  • #1
smoothoperator
37
0
I'm a beginner in GR (as you may conclude from some of my previous posts) so any help is greatly appreciated.

I was recently studying alternative metrics for the Schwarzschild metric and one of them was the Kruskal Szekeres metric.

In Schwarzschild, the radius r is defined which is the radius from the centre of the object with mass we are sutdying. In K-S metric the Tortoise coordinate was mentioned with a value greater than the classical r in Schwarzschild.

So my question is, if we use a different metric, in this case the K-S metric, does the radial spatial distance between two points change? And can anybody give me a concrete example, for instance a distance of 1m near Earth would be what distance according to Kruskal and Szekeres coordinates?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Kruskal-Szekeres is not an alternative metric, it is a different coordinate system of the same manifold with the same metric. In the overlapping regions, the KS coordinates describe the very same physical situation. Just like you can use polar coordinates in ##\mathbb R^2## without changing the fact that you are describing ##\mathbb R^2##.
 
  • #3
Proper distances, being proper, do not depend on the particular coordinate system you choose. If you chose 1 path, parametrized by ##\lambda##, between two points ##1,2##, the proper distance between them is given by $$s=\int_1^2 \sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}}d\lambda$$ You should verify for yourself that a change of coordinates changes ##g_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow g_{\mu'\nu'}## and ##x^\mu(\lambda)\rightarrow x^{\mu'}(\lambda)## but does not change ##s##.
 

FAQ: Kruskal-Szekeres Radius: Explained for Beginners in GR

What is the Kruskal-Szekeres radius in general relativity?

The Kruskal-Szekeres radius is a mathematical concept used in general relativity to describe the boundary of a black hole. It represents the distance from the center of the black hole at which light can no longer escape its gravitational pull.

How is the Kruskal-Szekeres radius calculated?

The Kruskal-Szekeres radius is calculated using the Schwarzschild metric, which is a mathematical equation that describes the curvature of spacetime around a non-rotating black hole. This metric takes into account the mass and radius of the black hole to determine the Kruskal-Szekeres radius.

What is the significance of the Kruskal-Szekeres radius?

The Kruskal-Szekeres radius is significant because it marks the boundary between the region of spacetime that is affected by the black hole's gravity and the region that is not. This boundary is also known as the event horizon, and it is the point at which an object would need to travel faster than the speed of light to escape the black hole's gravitational pull.

How does the Kruskal-Szekeres radius differ from the Schwarzschild radius?

The Kruskal-Szekeres radius and the Schwarzschild radius are both measures of a black hole's size, but they represent different aspects. The Schwarzschild radius is the distance from the center of the black hole at which its gravitational pull becomes infinite, while the Kruskal-Szekeres radius is the distance at which light can no longer escape. The Kruskal-Szekeres radius is always larger than the Schwarzschild radius.

What are some real-world applications of the Kruskal-Szekeres radius?

The Kruskal-Szekeres radius is a theoretical concept and is not directly applicable in the real world. However, it is a crucial element in understanding the properties of black holes and their effects on the surrounding spacetime. This knowledge can have implications for future space exploration and our understanding of the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
927
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top