Lagrangian/Stationary-action principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lambda96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation using the Hamiltonian function H(x, dot{x}, t) and finding stationary solutions through the Euler-Lagrange equations. The user successfully derived x(t) and attempted to apply initial conditions, but faced challenges in completing subsequent tasks, particularly in integrating the action functional S[x]. They expressed confusion over the absence of a variable Q in their integral solution and struggled with finding antiderivatives for certain expressions. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding Lagrangian mechanics and the Euler-Lagrange equations in the context of stationary action principles.
Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Find a stationary solution
Relevant Equations
Lagrangian ##L=x\dot{x}(2\alpha - \dot{x})##
Hi

the text is unfortunately a bit longer, but I have included it anyway to provide all the information.

Bildschirmfoto 2022-11-29 um 19.17.39.png

I am not sure if I understood the task b correctly, but I understood it as follows: using the equation ##H(x,\dot{x},t)##, solve the differential equation for ##x(t)##.

Once you have found ##x(t)##, you have to use it to find the statin solutions, i.e. form the first derivative of ##x(t)## and set it to 0.

I then first formed ##H(x,\dot{x},t)## and got the following ##H(x,\dot{x},t)=-x\dot{x}^2##

And ##H(x,\dot{x},t)=c## which leads to ##c=-x\dot{x}^2##

After that, I did the separation of variables,

$$\sqrt{x}dx=-\sqrt{c}dt$$

Then I integrated both sides and solved for ##x(t)## and got the following.

$$x(t)=\sqrt[3]{\frac{9}{4}(a-\sqrt{c}*t)^2}$$

##a## is the constant of integration.

Now, to get the stationary solution, I have to form ##\frac{dx(t)}{dt}=0##.

Have I done everything right up to this point, or have I completely misunderstood the task?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess they meant to find the solution of the Euler-Lagrange equations, which makes the "action functional" stationary. I've not checked your calculation in detail, but it looks reasonable.
 
Thank you vanhees71 for your help

I then determined the following form with the help of the initial condition ##x(t_i)=0##.

$$x(t)=\frac{9c}{4}^{1/3}(t_i-t)^{1/3}$$

In task c you had to derive the Euler Lagrange equation and put ##x(t)## in there, and with the above result I get 0.

Unfortunately, I can't get any further with task d.

Bildschirmfoto 2022-11-30 um 20.01.15.png

I would have simply calculated the above functional with ##S[x]= \int_{t_i}^{t_f} L(x,\dot{x})dt ## with ##x(t)##, ##\dot{x}(t)## which I got in task b but Q does not appear at all when I solve the integral?
 
I don't understand (d).

Note that the piece
$$\tilde{L}=2 \alpha x \dot{x}=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} (\alpha x^2).$$
Check, what this term contributes to the equations of motion!
 
Thank you vanhees71 for your help 👍

I had already thought of that, that I form the antiderivatives of ##S=2x\dot{x}\alpha-x\dot{x}^2## and just put ##x(t)## there, unfortunately the expression ##x\dot{x}^2## gives me problems, because I can't find the antiderivatives for this expression, even with wolframalpha I can't find any.
 
I wanted to hint you at something else. Think about a Lagrangian of the form
$$L=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} f(x,t)=\dot{x} \partial_x f(x,t) + \partial_t f(x,t).$$
What are the Euler-Lagrange equations for such a Lagrangian?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top