I Laplace equation with irregular boundaries

AI Thread Summary
Solving Laplace’s Equation on irregular domains analytically is challenging, as separation of variables typically requires boundaries where one coordinate is constant. In 2D cases, complex functions and conformal mappings offer elegant solutions, but irregular geometries are common in real-life applications, often necessitating numerical methods. The use of generalized Fourier series can help in boundary-value problems, but these methods are limited to specific coordinate systems. While analytical solutions may not be feasible for all irregular shapes, studying simpler textbook problems can provide valuable insights. Ultimately, numerical techniques are frequently employed for practical applications involving irregular boundaries.
physwiz222
Messages
79
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
We can solve Laplace’a Equation on regular shapes like squares and circles but what if we have an irregular shape can it still be solved
Is there a way to solve Laplace’s Equation on irregular domains if the domain’s shape is given by a function for example a 2D parabolic plate. I keep seeing numerical methods but I want to know is there an ANALYTICAL method to solve it on an irregular domain. If there isn't are there approximate analytical methods to solve it. If it isn't solvable why not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
 
vanhees71 said:
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
Interesting but one more question can separation of variables be used for a solution on an irregular boundary given by a function. And how common are irregular geometries encountered in real life problems
 
Last edited:
vanhees71 said:
Usually you need coordinates, where the Laplacian "separates". Then you can find solutions of boundary-value problems by expansion in terms of the corresponding orthogonal function systems (generalized Fourier series).

The 2D case is special since there you can apply the very elegant formulation in terms of complex functions and conformal mappings.

A good book about all this is

P. M. Morse, H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, 2 Vols., McGraw-Hill (1953)
How about the 3D case
 
physwiz222 said:
Interesting but one more question can separation of variables be used for a solution on an irregular boundary given by a function. And how common are irregular geometries encountered in real life problems
For The Laplace equation you can only use separation of variables when the boundaries are on surfaces where one of the coordinates is a constant. In Cartesian coordinates, the boundaries must be x=constant or y=constant or z=constant. In cylindrical coordinates the boundaries must be r=constant, z=constant or theta=constant. Etc.

In real life it is common to have irregular boundaries, and we usually must resort to numerical techniques. However, solving the simple problems in textbooks and examining properties of the solutions often yields a lot of insight to help with understanding those real-life cases.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top