- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading N. L. Carothers' book: "Real Analysis". ... ...
I am focused on Chapter 16: Lebesgue Measure ... ...
I need help with the proof of Proposition 16.2 part (i) ...
Proposition 16.2 and its proof read as follows:
Carothers does not prove Proposition 16.2 (i) above ...
Although it seems intuitively obvious, I am unable to construct and express a valid, convincing, formal and rigorous proof of the result ...
Can someone please demonstrate a formal and rigorous proof of Proposition 16.2 (i) above ...
Peter
========================================================================================================It may help readers of the above post to have access to Carothers introduction to Lebesgue outer measure ... so I am providing the same as follows:
Hope that helps ...
Peter
I am focused on Chapter 16: Lebesgue Measure ... ...
I need help with the proof of Proposition 16.2 part (i) ...
Proposition 16.2 and its proof read as follows:
Carothers does not prove Proposition 16.2 (i) above ...
Although it seems intuitively obvious, I am unable to construct and express a valid, convincing, formal and rigorous proof of the result ...
Can someone please demonstrate a formal and rigorous proof of Proposition 16.2 (i) above ...
Peter
========================================================================================================It may help readers of the above post to have access to Carothers introduction to Lebesgue outer measure ... so I am providing the same as follows:
Peter
Last edited: