Light as a Constant: Examining the Paradox

In summary, the speed of light is constant and does not depend on the relative motion of the observer.
  • #1
matt4584
3
0
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
matt4584 said:
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?
You are mistaken about the baseball example: in fact the observer on the ground measures the speed of the baseball to be very slightly less than 50m/s.

If the speed of the train is ##u## and the ball is thrown at speed ##v##, its speed relative to the ground will not be ##u+v##, it will be ##(u+v)/(1+\frac{uv}{c^2})##. This formula has been verified by experiment.

It would be a good exercise to try calculating this for the speeds in your example; you will quickly see why in daily life we never notice that ##(u+v)## is not exactly correct. It's also worth seeing what happens when you set ##v=c##, shining a light forward in the moving train.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
matt4584 said:
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?

Because that's the way the universe works. None of us built it. We just found it this way. Cool, isn't it?
 
  • Like
Likes John Park, XZ923 and davenn
  • #4
matt4584 the classic observation of this is the Michelson Morley experiment where light beams were sent parallel to the rotation of the surface Earth which is also pretty close to the direction of motion of the Earth about the sun and normal to the direction of rotation of the Earth and its direction of rotation about the sun. The velocity of light is measured to be the same in both directions, which it would not be if a medium through which the Earth moved in its motion about the sum had existed. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment) for more detail. The Kennedy-Thorndike experiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy–Thorndike_experiment) directly confirms that the speed of light is constant and with the Ives Stilwell experiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ives–Stilwell_experiment) confirms the Lorentz transformation of special relativity.
 

FAQ: Light as a Constant: Examining the Paradox

1. What is the paradox of light as a constant?

The paradox of light as a constant refers to the fact that, according to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light is always constant in a vacuum regardless of the observer's frame of reference. This means that no matter how fast an observer is moving, they will always measure the speed of light to be the same.

2. How does this contradict the classical principle of relativity?

The classical principle of relativity states that the laws of physics should be the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. However, the constant speed of light contradicts this principle because it implies that there is a preferred frame of reference in which the laws of physics are different.

3. What are the implications of the paradox of light as a constant?

The implications of this paradox are far-reaching and have revolutionized our understanding of space and time. It has led to the development of Einstein's theory of special relativity, which has been confirmed by numerous experiments and has become a fundamental principle of modern physics.

4. How has the paradox of light as a constant been tested and confirmed?

One of the most famous experiments that tested the constant speed of light was the Michelson-Morley experiment in the late 19th century. Since then, numerous other experiments, including the famous Hafele-Keating experiment, have confirmed the constancy of the speed of light. Additionally, modern technologies such as GPS and particle accelerators rely on the principles of special relativity and have further confirmed its validity.

5. Can anything travel faster than the speed of light?

According to our current understanding of physics, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. This is because, as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely, making it impossible to accelerate further. This is known as the theory of general relativity, and it has been confirmed by numerous experiments.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
98
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top