Limit of (1+ln x)/x as x -> 0?

  • Thread starter Fre4k
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Limit
In summary, the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 is -infinity. This can be determined analytically by using L'Hopital's Rule and the fact that ln x approaches -infinity faster than 1/x approaches infinity as x approaches 0. It is important to note that the limit is only meaningful when approaching from the positive side, as the natural logarithm is not defined on the negative side. Overall, the limit can be simplified to the limit of ln x/x, which is -infinity.
  • #1
Fre4k
12
0

Homework Statement



lim (1+ln x)/x = ?
x->0

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



lim 1/x + (ln x)/x
x->0
I know that (ln x)/x approaches -infinity faster than 1/x approaches infinity so the limit = -infinity, but how do I express this analytically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ok, I got it. It's quite simple actually, duh.
 
  • #3
Fre4k said:
Ok, I got it. It's quite simple actually, duh.
That's great to hear.

By the way, welcome to PF !
 
  • #4
Yep, you just had to use L'Hopital's Rule and the answer is infinity.
 
  • #5
SammyS said:
That's great to hear.

By the way, welcome to PF !

Thanks. :)
 
  • #6
sharks said:
Yep, you just had to use L'Hopital's Rule and the answer is infinity.
That's not an indeterminate form. The Hospital rule doesn't apply.
 
  • #7
Hi vela

Here is my understanding of the problem:
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0} \frac{1+\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0} \frac{1}{x}+\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0} \frac{1}{x}=∞[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}=∞[/tex]
The limit above is evaluated by using L'Hopital's Rule.
 
  • #8
That's not an indeterminate form. The Hospital rule doesn't apply.
 
  • #9
vela said:
That's not an indeterminate form. The Hospital rule doesn't apply.

Agreed, -∞/0 is not an indeterminate form. I kept assuming n approaches ∞ :redface:

To evaluate:
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x[/tex]
[tex]1/0=+∞[/tex]
[tex]\ln 0=-∞[/tex]
Hence, the product is -∞
 
Last edited:
  • #10
sharks said:
Agreed, -∞/0 is not an indeterminate form. I kept assuming n approaches ∞ :redface:

To evaluate:
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x[/tex]
[tex]1/0=+∞[/tex]
[tex]\ln 0=-∞[/tex]
Hence, the product is -∞
So, so wrong.
 
  • #11
sharks said:
Agreed, -∞/0 is not an indeterminate form. I kept assuming n approaches ∞ :redface:

To evaluate:
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x[/tex]
[tex]1/0=+∞[/tex]
[tex]\ln 0=-∞[/tex]
Hence, the product is -∞

You wrote for n -> 0, but I assume that was a typo :-p Division by 0 is not defined for real numbers, so cannot exactly call it equal to positive infinity. Only,

[itex]\lim_{x\to 0^{+}} \frac{1}{x} = +\infty[/itex]

[itex]\lim_{x\to 0^{-}} \frac{1}{x} = -\infty[/itex]

Which means that the original limit will not be two sided.
 
  • #12
Infinitum said:
You wrote for n -> 0, but I assume that was a typo :-p Division by 0 is not defined for real numbers, so cannot exactly call it equal to positive infinity. Only,

[itex]\lim_{x\to 0^{+}} \frac{1}{x} = +\infty[/itex]

[itex]\lim_{x\to 0^{-}} \frac{1}{x} = -\infty[/itex]

Which means that the original limit will not be two sided.

The original limit is only meaningful approaching from the positive side, since the natural logarithm isn't defined on the negative side. So from the point of view of this problem, it is safe to say that the limit of [itex]1 / x[/itex] is positive infinity (unless we want to agree that a limit is only meaningful if it is defined from both sides, in which case this thread is over).
 
  • #13
Hi Infinitum and Steely Dan

Thank you both for the clarification.
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1+\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1}{x}+\lim_{n\to 0^+}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x=(+\infty)+(+\infty.-\infty)=(+\infty)+(-\infty)[/tex] which is undefined.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
sharks said:
Hi Infinitum and Steely Dan

Thank you both for the clarification.
[tex]\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1+\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1}{x}+\lim_{n\to 0^+}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x=(+\infty)+(+\infty.-\infty)=(+\infty)+(-\infty)[/tex] which is undefined.

This is not the way to go about it. If you know the properties of the natural logarithm, it's very clear that [itex]\text{ln}(x) + 1 \approx \text{ln}(x)[/itex] if [itex]x[/itex] is very small. So really this problem is just the limit of [itex]\text{ln}(x) / x[/itex] (which is clearly [itex]-\infty[/itex]).
 
  • #15
Steely Dan said:
This is not the way to go about it. If you know the properties of the natural logarithm, it's very clear that [itex]\text{ln}(x) + 1 \approx \text{ln}(x)[/itex] if [itex]x[/itex] is very small. So really this problem is just the limit of [itex]\text{ln}(x) / x[/itex] (which is clearly [itex]-\infty[/itex]).
I overlooked that part but it's clear that -∞+1≈-∞. Thanks again. :smile:
 

FAQ: Limit of (1+ln x)/x as x -> 0?

What is the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0?

The limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 is undefined. This can be seen by plugging in 0 for x, which would result in dividing by 0, which is undefined.

How do I calculate the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0?

To calculate the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0, you can use the L'Hopital's rule or the squeeze theorem. Both methods involve taking the limit of the numerator and denominator separately and then simplifying the expression.

Why is the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 undefined?

The limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 is undefined because the function is not defined at x=0. As x gets closer and closer to 0, the function approaches infinity, which is why the limit is undefined.

Can the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 be evaluated using a graph?

Yes, the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 can be evaluated using a graph. By graphing the function, you can see that as x approaches 0, the function approaches infinity, which tells us that the limit is undefined.

Can the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 be simplified?

Yes, the limit of (1+ln x)/x as x approaches 0 can be simplified using algebraic manipulation or by using the L'Hopital's rule. However, the simplified form will still result in an undefined limit, as the function is not defined at x=0.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Back
Top