- #1
JG89
- 728
- 1
Homework Statement
If a_v > 0 and [tex] \sum_{v=0}^{\infty} a_v [/tex] converges, then prove that [tex] \lim_{x \rightarrow 1^-} \sum_{v=0}^{\infty} a_v x^v = \sum_{v=0}^{\infty} a_v [/tex].
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
Since [tex] \sum a_v [/tex] converges, then we can say that [tex] \sum a_v x^v [/tex] converges for x = 1. This implies that it converges uniformly for
all |x| < 1.
Let [tex] f(x) = \sum a_v x^v [/tex] for |x| < 1. Since the convergence is uniform, we know that f is continuous in its interval of convergence. Since the power series converges as well for x = 1, we can also say that f(x) is "left-hand continuous" at x = 1. That is, for all positive epsilon there exists a positive delta such that [tex] |f(x) - f(1)| < \epsilon [/tex] whenever [tex] |x - 1| < \delta [/tex], if we only take x approaching 1 from the left.
Note that [tex] |f(x) - f(1)| = |\sum a_v x^v - \sum a_v | < \epsilon [/tex] whenever [tex] |x-1| < \delta [/tex].
This is precisely the statement: [tex] \lim_{x \rightarrow 1^-} \sum_{v=0}^{\infty} a_v x^v = \sum_{v=0}^{\infty} a_v [/tex]. QED.
The proof seems bullet-proof to me, but what bugs me is that I didn't use the fact that the a_v are positive, so there must be something wrong with the proof...