Limit question / algebra problem

In summary, the conversation was about solving for the derivative of a function using the limit definition. The steps involved simplifying the expression and finding the limit as h approaches 0. The final answer was 1/a^2.
  • #1
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,753
143
I forgot how to do the algebra in this one.

[tex]
\begin{array}{l}
f(x) = \frac{{ - 1}}{x};\,\,a = 1 \\
\\
f'(a) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{f(a + h) - f(a)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\frac{{ - 1}}{{a + h}} - \frac{{ - 1}}{a}}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\frac{{ - 1a}}{{a(a + h)}} - \frac{{ - 1(a + h)}}{{a(a + h)}}}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - a - a + h}}{{a(a + h)}}} \right)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - 2a + h}}{{a^2 + ah}}} \right)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{ - 2a + h}}{{a^2 + ah}}\,\,\frac{1}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{ - 2a + h}}{{h\left( {a^2 + ah} \right)}} \\
\end{array}
[/tex]

Am I even going in the right direction? If so, what comes next?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You screwed up adding the fractions. -(-1) = 1.
 
  • #3
That's a bit nicer. Thanks d leet
[tex]
\begin{array}{l}
f(x) = \frac{{ - 1}}{x};\,\,a = 1 \\
\\
f'(a) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{f(a + h) - f(a)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\frac{{ - 1}}{{a + h}} - \frac{{ - 1}}{a}}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\frac{{ - 1a}}{{a(a + h)}} - \frac{{ - 1(a + h)}}{{a(a + h)}}}}{a} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - a - \left( { - a - h} \right)}}{{a(a + h)}}} \right)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - a + a + h}}{{a(a + h)}}} \right)}}{h} \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - a + a + h}}{{a(a + h)}}} \right)}}{h} \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{h}{{a^2 + ah}}} \right)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{h}{{a^2 + ah}}\,\,\frac{1}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{h}{{h\left( {a^2 + ah} \right)}} = \\
\\
f'(a) = \frac{1}{{a^2 }} \\
\end{array}
[/tex]
Now I can't find my TEX error, but I get the right answer: 1/a^2
 
Last edited:
  • #4
[tex]
\begin{array}{l}
f(x) = \frac{{ - 1}}{x};\,\,a = 1 \\
\\
f'(a) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{f(a + h) - f(a)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\frac{{ - 1}}{{a + h}} - \frac{{ - 1}}{a}}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\frac{{ - 1a}}{{a(a + h)}} - \frac{{ - 1(a + h)}}{{a(a + h)}}}}{a} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - a - \left( { - a - h} \right)}}{{a(a + h)}}} \right)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - a + a + h}}{{a(a + h)}}} \right)}}{h} \\
\end{array}
[/tex]
[tex]
\begin{array}{l}
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{{ - a + a + h}}{{a(a + h)}}} \right)}}{h} \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\frac{h}{{a^2 + ah}}} \right)}}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{h}{{a^2 + ah}}\,\,\frac{1}{h} = \\
\\
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{h}{{h\left( {a^2 + ah} \right)}} = \\
\\
f'(a) = \frac{1}{{a^2 }} \\
\end{array}[/tex]
I think you should split it up a bit, it seems to work if you split it into 2 LaTeX images. However, IMHO, you are using way too many brackets of the type {...}. It should be clearer if you you less of them. Say, instead of typing \frac{{-1}}{a}, just type:
\frac{-1}{a}, which also displays the correct image, but the code does look nicer, right?
[tex]\frac{-1}{a}[/tex]
Don't complicate things... :)
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Thanks, VietDao. I was having some trouble with the forum. Clicking on my code wouldn't open it so I couldn't edit it.

Actually, I didn't hand-code this TEX. I use Math-type, which translates it into tex for me. In a sense it's like using MS Word to write a simple web page. Hand-coding HTML is short and to the point, and the code looks nice. But the Word version, even in the simplest example is mind-numbingly complex.

I'm better with Math-type than tex, and Math-type let's you see what you're typing, i.e., WYSIWYG. So for the longer problems I use Math-type and have it translate.

Thanks for fixing it for me. It was frusterating me more than dumb mistake than d leet pointed out to me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
823
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Back
Top