Limits (another error in the question?)

In summary, the limit in c does not exist because as r goes to 0, the limit does not depend upon \theta.
  • #1
Yann
48
0

Homework Statement



a) Prove that;

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{x^2y}{x^2+y^2} = 0[/tex]

b) Prove that if [tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} f(x,y) = L_1[/tex] and [tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} f(x,y) = L_2[/tex], then [tex]L_1=L_2[/tex]

c) Using the statement proven in 5b, prove that

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{xy}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]

Does NOT exist.

2. The attempt at a solution

a)

[tex]f(0,y) = \frac{0}{y^2} = 0[/tex]

[tex]f(x,0) = \frac{0}{x^2} = 0[/tex]

From those 2 directions, the limit is the same, so;

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{x^2y}{x^2+y^2} = 0[/tex]

b)

I have no idea how to do that, it seems to evident !

c)

Does NOT exist ? But...

[tex]f(0,y) = \frac{0}{y^2} = 0[/tex]

[tex]f(x,0) = \frac{0}{x^2} = 0[/tex]

It's exactly the same thing as in a), the limit DOES exist and it is;

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{xy}{x^2+y^2} = 0[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ahh for b), seeing as they are the same limit, they must evaluate to the same thing. L1=L2
 
  • #3
ops, I got it wrong. The limit in c doesn't exist because at (x,mx);

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{mx^2}{x^2(1+m)} = \frac{m}{m+1}[/tex]

However, this leads me to 2 questions;

I just proved the limit in c doesn't exist, why on Earth would I need, or even, how could I use the statement in b ?

Also, is my "proof" that the limit in a equal 0 sufficient ? Even at (x,mx) the limit is still 0, but still, is this a proof that the limit is 0 ?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
The logic in problem c) is that since you have two different limits you contradicted b) so that the limit does not exist.

b) is just saying that if the (some) limit exists, then it is unique. Part b) can be resolved by general limit arguments, not talking just about function of two variables x,y.
 
  • #5
You answer to a) does not account for (x,y) approaching (0,0) in any arbitrary path. What happens as the distance r from (0,0) goes to zero? (Hint: remember polar coords?)
 
  • #6
I think (b) is badly stated. I would interpret what they say as "the limit is unique". That's easy to prove. Suppose there existed two different limits, L1, L2. Take [itex]\epsilon= |L_1- L_2|/2[/itex]. Show that no [itex]\delta[/itex] makes both [itex]|f(x)- L_1|< \epsilon[/itex] and [itex]|f(x)- L_2|< \epsilon[/itex] for (x,y) such that [itex]\sqrt{(x^2+ y^2}< \delta[/itex].

However, that's clearly not what's meant. What they mean is that if the limit itself exists, then the limits along any path must be the same. Unfortunately, the way it is stated implies that the "limit" means the limit "along some path" which is not true.


As gammamcc said, showing that the limit along two different paths gives the same thing does not prove that the limit exists. you must show that f(x,y) is close to some L as long as (x,y) is close to (0,0). Again, as gammamcc said, consider changing to polar coordinates. That way r itself measures the distance from (0,0). If the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend upon [itex]\theta[/itex], then the limit exists.
 
  • #7
Great, thank you both, I have my answer.
 

FAQ: Limits (another error in the question?)

What are limits in scientific research?

Limits in scientific research refer to the boundaries or constraints that may exist in conducting a study or experiment. These can include factors such as time, resources, ethical considerations, and technical limitations.

Why are limits important in science?

Limits are important in science because they help researchers to design and conduct experiments that are feasible and ethical. They also help to ensure that the results of a study are accurate and reliable.

What are some examples of limits in scientific research?

Some examples of limits in scientific research include limited funding or resources, time constraints, ethical considerations, and technical limitations such as equipment or technology.

How can scientists overcome limits in their research?

Scientists can overcome limits in their research by carefully planning their experiments, seeking collaborations or funding opportunities, and continuously evaluating and adjusting their methods to address any challenges that may arise.

What are the potential consequences of ignoring limits in scientific research?

Ignoring limits in scientific research can lead to inaccurate or unreliable results, ethical violations, and wasted time and resources. It can also hinder the progress of scientific knowledge and potentially harm individuals or the environment.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
788
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top