Limits with two variables, explain why limit DNE

In summary: When y=x, the x^8 is evaluated at 0, but what happens to the remaining fraction x^5/x^4. Is that simply "x", which is then evaluated again at 0?x^5/x^4 simplifies to 1 when x→0, and the limit of this is 1.
  • #1
lonewolf219
186
2

Homework Statement


(Sorry, having problems with math symbols)

lim f(x,y) [(x^4)y]/(x^8+y^4)
(x,y)→(0,0)

Homework Equations



Compare limits when

a.) y=x
b.) y=x^4

The Attempt at a Solution



The solutions are

a.) limit approaches 0
b.) limit approaches 1

I think I understand in order for a limit to exist, it must approach the same value regardless of which direction we approach it from. So I think that the limit DNE here because there are two different values approached. However, not really sure how to substitute values into the equation without getting zero for both a and b.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are correct about the limit not existing.

To evaluate the limits, you are given formulas for what y is in terms of x. You can simply plug these equations in and eliminate a variable and solve the limit. Since Both equations approach the same point, the variable that is still left approaches 0. You are effectively making a 2-d problem into a 1-d problem.

So, if [itex]y=x[/itex], [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{(x,y) \rightarrow (0,0)} \displaystyle\frac{x^{4}y}{x^{8}+y^{4}} = \displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \displaystyle\frac{x^{5}}{x^8+x^4}[/itex]. What do you get when you solve this limit?

Similarly, for [itex]y=x^{4}[/itex], [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{(x,y) \rightarrow (0,0)} \displaystyle\frac{x^{4}y}{x^{8}+y^{4}} = \displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \displaystyle\frac{x^{8}}{x^{8}+(x^{4})^{4}}[/itex]. What is the limit of this?
 
  • #3
(I am assuming we are evaluating the function at the point (0,0), if this is correct terminology?)

When y=x, the x^8 is evaluated at 0, but what happens to the remaining fraction x^5/x^4. Is that simply "x", which is then evaluated again at 0?

When y=x^4, the x^8 in the denominator again becomes 0, and a fraction remains that is x^8/x^8 which is 1? Thanks for your reply scurty

But perhaps this is not simply evaluating a function at point (a)...
 
  • #4
(I am assuming we are evaluating the function at the point (0,0), if this is correct terminology?)

Yes, that's exactly what you are doing. However, you are approaching the point (0,0) from two different directions in parts a) and b). Because the limit values are not the same when approached from ALL directions, the limit does not exist.

Think of this problem when only considering one variable (i.e. the real plane). Say you want to evaluate [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{x}[/itex]. To solve this you need to make sure [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{-}} \frac{1}{x} = \displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{1}{x}[/itex]. Only then does the limit value exist! (in this case the limit does not exist)

This is no different except we are considering two variables. To make the calculation easier we substitute for variables to reduce it to one.

When y=x, the x^8 is evaluated at 0, but what happens to the remaining fraction x^5/x^4. Is that simply "x", which is then evaluated again at 0?

Not quite. Try factoring out the greatest common factor out of the denominator and see what you are left with!

When y=x^4, the x^8 in the denominator again becomes 0, and a fraction remains that is x^8/x^8 which is 1? Thanks for your reply scurty

Try the same method I suggested above. We are taking the limit as x approaches 0, not as [itex]x^{4}[/itex] approaches 0.

Does that make more sense hopefully?
 
  • #5
Thanks for mentioning we are reducing the problem from two dimensions to one dimension.. and for providing that example. Jarring my memory of calc 1 and now I see "of course that's what we were doing back then!"

Let's see how I did...

y=x

(x^4/x^4)[x/(x^4+1)]→(x=0)→(0/0+1) = 0

y=x^4

(x^8/x^8)[1/(1+x^8)] →(x=0)→(1/1+0) = 10≠1
limit DNE
 
  • #6
Exactly! Nice work! Sometimes the tricky problems are coming up with two different equations to approach the point at to show the limit doesn't exist by yourself. In this problem they gave you the two so it wasn't so bad.
 
  • #7
Thanks Scurty! This forum is awesome!
 
  • #8
lonewolf219 said:
(I am assuming we are evaluating the function at the point (0,0), if this is correct terminology?)

When y=x, the x^8 is evaluated at 0, but what happens to the remaining fraction x^5/x^4. Is that simply "x", which is then evaluated again at 0?

When y=x^4, the x^8 in the denominator again becomes 0, and a fraction remains that is x^8/x^8 which is 1? Thanks for your reply scurty

But perhaps this is not simply evaluating a function at point (a)...

I'm assuming that what you mean by "the function," you mean ## \frac{x^4y}{x^8 + y^4}##.

If so, you cannot evaluate this function at the point (0, 0), because this function is undefined there. That's the reason that you are asked to evaluate the limit as (x, y) → (0, 0).

Along each the specified paths, the function simplifies to a different function that involves only x, and you can take the limit as x → 0.

Note that for both limits, you cannot simply evaluate the limit expression at x = 0, as both limit expressions are undefined at x = 0. Using the properties of limits, however, you can evaluate both limits.

As you have found, on each of these paths a limit exists, but it is not the same limit for both paths.

scurty said:
Yes, that's exactly what you are doing.
No it isn't. The function in the original limit is undefined at the point (0, 0). In addition, along each of the two paths, the simplfied limit expression was undefined at x = 0.
 
  • #9
Mark44 said:
No it isn't. The function in the original limit is undefined at the point (0, 0). In addition, along each of the two paths, the simplfied limit expression was undefined at x = 0.

Sorry, I misread his text. I read it as evaluating the limit of the function at the point (0,0), he left out the limit part though.
 

FAQ: Limits with two variables, explain why limit DNE

What does it mean when a limit with two variables does not exist?

When a limit with two variables does not exist, it means that the function being evaluated has different limit values depending on the direction from which the two variables approach the given point. In other words, the limit approaches different values when the variables approach the point from different directions.

Why can't we use the regular methods for finding limits when there are two variables?

In the case of a limit with two variables, the value of the limit is affected by the approach of both variables to the given point. This makes it impossible to use the regular methods for finding limits, such as substitution or factoring, which only work for limits with one variable.

Can the limit exist for one variable but not for the other?

Yes, the limit can exist for one variable but not for the other. This is because the behavior of the function may differ depending on the approach of each variable to the given point. One variable may have a limit while the other does not, resulting in the overall limit not existing.

How can we determine if a limit with two variables does not exist?

To determine if a limit with two variables does not exist, we can approach the given point from different paths and see if the limit values are different. If the limit values are different, then the limit does not exist. Another way is to analyze the function and see if there are any points of discontinuity or undefined points near the given point, which would also result in the limit not existing.

Is there a way to prove that a limit with two variables does not exist?

Yes, there are several ways to prove that a limit with two variables does not exist. One way is to use the ε-δ definition of a limit and show that for any given δ, there exist two different ε values, indicating that the limit cannot exist. Another way is to use the Squeeze Theorem and show that the function is bounded between two different functions with different limit values, proving that the overall limit does not exist.

Back
Top