Linear Gradient Series Derivation

In summary: N, and the present value of that stream is\text{PV2} = A + (A+a)\rho + (A+2a) \rho^2 + \cdots + (A + Na) \rho^N= \frac{A(1-\rho^{N+1}) - aN \rho^{N+1}}{1-\rho} + \frac{a(\rho - \rho^{N+1})}{(1-\rho)^2}.
  • #1
lpau001
25
0
Howdy, I guess I need to explain this situation a little bit.. I am doing a project about a guy buying a house, but using a gradient series approach to do the payments, for example, say the original monthly payment for a $225,000 15 year loan is ~$1600. The guy will pay that the first month, and then add increasing amounts of $50 for each month to pay off the note faster. I was hoping someone could help me with this? I talked with my professor and he VERY briefly just mentioned that you can get the formula for it by adding the two series together.. Like the original month to month payment of $1600 and then add the series of increasing $50 amounts. I was hoping someone could help me with the derivation of this? I found this formula, but I don't want to just use something I don't know anything about.. This project is kind of an extra assignment, and therefore it's really out of the scope of my class.. so I don't have any kind of notes or anything to help.

15 year note, 3.6% APR

Formula I found - [itex] P = G \frac{(1+i)^{N}-iN-1}{i^{2}(1+i)^{N}} [/itex]

Formula I have from class - [itex] P = A \frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} [/itex]

When looking at the two, I can see similarities, but I'm not sure what the straight formula for just G is.. Anywho, hopefully this was clear..

My end goal was to calculate how much faster he could pay the loan off, and how much money he would save.


Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How would you derive the formula that you already know?
 
  • #3
Well that's the problem. I found this formula online, but I was hoping someone could show me the actual steps to get to this formula so I could understand it?
 
  • #4
You have one formula "from the class" - can you explain how it is obtained?
 
  • #5
(1) [itex] F=P(1+i)^{N} [/itex]
(2) [itex] F=A \frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i} [/itex]

(2) is derived from [itex] F = A(1+i)^{0} + A(1+i)^{1} + A(1+i)^{2} A(1+i)^{3} + ... + A(1+i)^{N-1} = A \frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{1+i-1} [/itex]

using (1) and (2) to solve for P gets the formula.
 
  • #6
lpau001 said:
Howdy, I guess I need to explain this situation a little bit.. I am doing a project about a guy buying a house, but using a gradient series approach to do the payments, for example, say the original monthly payment for a $225,000 15 year loan is ~$1600. The guy will pay that the first month, and then add increasing amounts of $50 for each month to pay off the note faster. I was hoping someone could help me with this? I talked with my professor and he VERY briefly just mentioned that you can get the formula for it by adding the two series together.. Like the original month to month payment of $1600 and then add the series of increasing $50 amounts. I was hoping someone could help me with the derivation of this? I found this formula, but I don't want to just use something I don't know anything about.. This project is kind of an extra assignment, and therefore it's really out of the scope of my class.. so I don't have any kind of notes or anything to help.

15 year note, 3.6% APR

Formula I found - [itex] P = G \frac{(1+i)^{N}-iN-1}{i^{2}(1+i)^{N}} [/itex]

Formula I have from class - [itex] P = A \frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} [/itex]

When looking at the two, I can see similarities, but I'm not sure what the straight formula for just G is.. Anywho, hopefully this was clear..

My end goal was to calculate how much faster he could pay the loan off, and how much money he would save.


Thanks for any help!

The present-value of a stream of steady payments A, A, A,..., A at times t=0, 1, 2,..., N is
[tex]\text{PV1} = A + A\rho + a \rho^2 + \cdots + A \rho^N = A \frac{1-\rho^{N+1}}{1-\rho},[/tex] where
[tex] \rho = \frac{1}{1+i}.[/tex]
However, the situation you describe is different: you have a string of increasing payments A, A+a, A+2a, ..., A+Na at times t = 0, 1, 2, ..., N, and the present value of that stream is
[tex] \text{PV2} = A + (A+a)\rho + (A+2a) \rho^2 + \cdots + (A + Na) \rho^N
= \frac{A(1-\rho^{N+1}) - aN \rho^{N+1}}{1-\rho} + \frac{a(\rho - \rho^{N+1})}{(1-\rho)^2}. [/tex]

You already know A = 1600, a = 50 and you can calculate [itex]\rho[/itex]. Solve (numerically) the equation PV2 = 225000 to find the new N (months).

RGV
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Ray Vickson said:
The present-value of a stream of steady payments A, A, A,..., A at times t=0, 1, 2,..., N is
[tex]\text{PV1} = A + A\rho + a \rho^2 + \cdots + A \rho^N = A \frac{1-\rho^{N+1}}{1-\rho},[/tex] where
[tex] \rho = \frac{1}{1+i}.[/tex]
However, the situation you describe is different: you have a string of increasing payments A, A+a, A+2a, ..., A+Na at times t = 0, 1, 2, ..., N, and the present value of that stream is
[tex] \text{PV2} = A + (A+a)\rho + (A+2a) \rho^2 + \cdots + (A + Na) \rho^N
= \frac{A(1-\rho^{N+1}) - aN \rho^{N+1}}{1-\rho} + \frac{a(\rho - \rho^{N+1})}{(1-\rho)^2}. [/tex]

You already know A = 1600, a = 50 and you can calculate [itex]\rho[/itex]. Solve (numerically) the equation PV2 = 225000 to find the new N (months).

RGV

This may sound dumb, but how do I solve for N when it is a normal variable AND an exponent? .. I'm totally baffled.
 
  • #8
You need to use a numerical method. If you have access to Maple, Mathematica or Matlab, you can ask that package to solve the equation. If you have access to a spreadsheet, such as EXCEL, you can use the built-in Solver tool to get a solution. Alternatively, you can get a rough solution by plotting PV2 as a function of N, then get a more accurate solution by an iterative improvement such as Newton's method or anyone of a dozen available methods (bisecting search, secant method, regula falsi, etc) Do a Google search on these names to get more details.

You might also try the free on-line package "Wolfram Alpha".

RGV
 
  • #9
Hmm.. ok! So if I don't have any of those fancy things, just 'guess and check' is as viable as anything?

Thanks for your help Ray.
 
  • #10
lpau001 said:
Hmm.. ok! So if I don't have any of those fancy things, just 'guess and check' is as viable as anything?

Thanks for your help Ray.

If you have internet access you have free access to Wolfram Alpha. I tried it: in the input panel, type
sum (1600+50*k)/(1 + 0.036/12)^k,k=0..N
After a while you get a formula in another panel, with the unknown N in it. You can outline the formula using the mouse and copy it to another panel, then insert the word 'solve' (no apostrophes) in front of it and '= 225000' (no apostrophes) after it. In a few seconds you get a graph, a numerical solution, etc.

Try it out: http://www.wolframalpha.com/

RGV
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ray, Thank you very much! I have used Wolfram Alpha before, but never to such an extent. Very cool.

I did have a quick question though, on your previous formula, where you have :


[itex] PV1 = A + Aρ + Aρ^{2} + ... + Aρ^{N} = A\frac{1-ρ^{N+1}}{1-ρ} [/itex]

Where [itex] ρ=\frac{1}{1+i} [/itex]


How did you get that formula? I am getting [itex] P = A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} [/itex]

When I try to set your formula and mine equal to each other, it never works out. Is my formula incorrect?
 
  • #12
lpau001 said:
Ray, Thank you very much! I have used Wolfram Alpha before, but never to such an extent. Very cool.

I did have a quick question though, on your previous formula, where you have :


[itex] PV1 = A + Aρ + Aρ^{2} + ... + Aρ^{N} = A\frac{1-ρ^{N+1}}{1-ρ} [/itex]

Where [itex] ρ=\frac{1}{1+i} [/itex]


How did you get that formula? I am getting [itex] P = A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} [/itex]

When I try to set your formula and mine equal to each other, it never works out. Is my formula incorrect?

[tex] \frac{1-\frac{1}{(1+i)^{N+1}}{1-\frac{1}{1+i}} = \frac{(1+i)^{N+1}-1}{i (1+i)^N}.[/tex]
The two formulas are exactly the same.

RGV
 
  • #13
The formula I was given in class was derived like this:

You have a set of N payments of amount A. The sum of these payments is symmetrical to a geometric progression sum. [itex] a + ax + ax^{2} + ... + ax^{N-1} = \frac{a(x^{n}-1)}{x-1} [/itex]

if you let [itex] x=(1+i) [/itex]

Then [itex] F=A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i} [/itex]

Using the simple formula [itex] F=P(1+i)^{N} [/itex] and and the one I just derived and solving for P, I get [itex] P=A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}}[/itex]

Rearranging that equation to solve for A gets: [itex] A=P\frac{i(1+i)^{N}}{(1+i)^{N}-1} [/itex]


That's how I got my formulas. Are there mistakes?

For your formula, when I try to make it equate to mine, I get:
[itex] P=A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} = A\frac{1-(\frac{1}{1+i})^{N+1}}{1-(\frac{1}{1+i})} [/itex]

which doesn't equate. I can alter your equation by simplifying the denominator and multiplying everything by [itex] \frac{(1+i)^{N+1}}{(1+i)^{N+1}}[/itex] to get [itex] P=A\frac{(1+i)^{N+1}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} [/itex] which is so close except for the N+1 in the exponential in the numerator. Again, I can't see any problems, but I can't really take a step back from it. Any help, again, is much appreciated!
 
  • #14
lpau001 said:
The formula I was given in class was derived like this:

You have a set of N payments of amount A. The sum of these payments is symmetrical to a geometric progression sum. [itex] a + ax + ax^{2} + ... + ax^{N-1} = \frac{a(x^{n}-1)}{x-1} [/itex]

if you let [itex] x=(1+i) [/itex]

Then [itex] F=A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i} [/itex]

Using the simple formula [itex] F=P(1+i)^{N} [/itex] and and the one I just derived and solving for P, I get [itex] P=A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}}[/itex]

Rearranging that equation to solve for A gets: [itex] A=P\frac{i(1+i)^{N}}{(1+i)^{N}-1} [/itex]


That's how I got my formulas. Are there mistakes?

For your formula, when I try to make it equate to mine, I get:
[itex] P=A\frac{(1+i)^{N}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} = A\frac{1-(\frac{1}{1+i})^{N+1}}{1-(\frac{1}{1+i})} [/itex]

which doesn't equate. I can alter your equation by simplifying the denominator and multiplying everything by [itex] \frac{(1+i)^{N+1}}{(1+i)^{N+1}}[/itex] to get [itex] P=A\frac{(1+i)^{N+1}-1}{i(1+i)^{N}} [/itex] which is so close except for the N+1 in the exponential in the numerator. Again, I can't see any problems, but I can't really take a step back from it. Any help, again, is much appreciated!

The LaTeX in my previous response failed, so here is the argument in plain text. Look at the expression for P involving ρ. Its numerator = 1-[1/(1+i)]^(N+1) and its denominator = 1-1/(1+i) = i/(1+i). Multiply the numerator and denominator by (1+i)^(N+1), to get: new numerator = (1+i)^(N+1) - 1, and new denominator = (1+i)^(N+1)*i/(1+i) = i*(1+i)^N, which is exactly what you got.

RGV
 

FAQ: Linear Gradient Series Derivation

What is a linear gradient series derivation?

A linear gradient series derivation is a mathematical technique used to find the sum of a series that follows a linear pattern. It involves finding a formula for the nth term of the series and using it to find the sum of all the terms in the series.

How is a linear gradient series derivation different from other series derivations?

Unlike other series derivations, a linear gradient series derivation involves finding a formula based on the pattern of the terms in the series. This formula is then used to find the sum of the series, rather than using a specific formula for a particular type of series.

What are the steps involved in a linear gradient series derivation?

The steps involved in a linear gradient series derivation are: 1) identifying the pattern of the series, 2) finding a formula for the nth term of the series, 3) using the formula to find the sum of the series, and 4) verifying the result by comparing it to the sum of a few terms in the series.

When is a linear gradient series derivation useful?

A linear gradient series derivation is useful when dealing with series that have a linear pattern, such as arithmetic series. It can also be helpful in finding the sum of a series when a specific formula is not available.

What are some common applications of linear gradient series derivation?

Linear gradient series derivation is often used in economics, finance, and engineering to calculate the present value of a series of payments or investments that follow a linear pattern. It is also used in physics and chemistry to find the sum of a series of data points that follow a linear trend.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top