Linear motion converted into rotatory motion problem

In summary: Keep up the good work. You are definitely on the right track.In summary, the conversation discusses the problem of finding the initial speed of an object in a ballistic pendulum experiment. The solution involves approaching the problem from an energy and momentum perspective, considering the collision as having two stages and using the conservation of momentum and energy equations to solve for the initial speed. The final expression for the initial speed is v_initial = [2g(m+M)^2(L-Lcos(theta))]^1/2 / m. This solution was arrived at with the help of another user, showing acts of kindness and collaboration in the online community.
  • #1
rabiakhan.91
12
0

Homework Statement


In a ballistic pendulum an object of mass m is fired with an initial speed v_0 at a pendulum bob. The bob has a mass M, which is suspended by a rod of length L and negligible mass. After the collision, the pendulum and object stick together and swing to a maximum angular displacement theta.
Find an expression for v_0, the initial speed of the fired object.
Express your answer in terms of some or all of the variables m, M, L, and theta and the acceleration due to gravity, g.
a figure is attached for better understanding!
please help! :(


Homework Equations



v= rω, s=rθ, ω=θ/t

The Attempt at a Solution



i have tried using the above examples but i don't know what to remove time since we are not asked to write in terms of time
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    7.7 KB · Views: 628
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Approach the problem from an energy and momentum point of view. Find final (maximum) PE, KE after the collision, KE before the collision.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
that was helpful! but while finding the potential energy, how will we find the height?
 
  • #4
rabiakhan.91 said:
but while finding the potential energy, how will we find the height?
Use a bit of trig.
 
  • #5
i got the answer v = (2g(m+M)(L-Lcostheta)/m)^1/2
what do u think?
 
  • #6
rabiakhan.91 said:
i got the answer v = (2g(m+M)(L-Lcostheta)/m)^1/2
what do u think?
Rather than just give your final answer, describe how you arrived at your answer.
 
  • #7
ok so i got the height as L-Lcostheta

the kinetic energy of the block is 0 and the kinetic energy of both of them at the heighest point is 0. so
1/2mv(initial)^2 = (m+M)g(L-Lcostheta)
then i just rearranged to find v

i am still a little doubtful about the height though
 
  • #8
rabiakhan.91 said:
ok so i got the height as L-Lcostheta

the kinetic energy of the block is 0 and the kinetic energy of both of them at the heighest point is 0. so
1/2mv(initial)^2 = (m+M)g(L-Lcostheta)
then i just rearranged to find v

i am still a little doubtful about the height though
The height is just fine. But your assumption that energy is conserved during the collision is not.
 
  • #9
umm but then how will we find the equations?
K.E before the collision is 1/2mvinitial^2
after the collision = 1/2(m+M)v^2 + mg(L-Lcostheta)
momentum is conserved so
mvinitial = (m+M)v
 
  • #10
rabiakhan.91 said:
momentum is conserved so
mvinitial = (m+M)v
Good. That's what you were missing.

Treat the motion as having two stages:
- The collision. Momentum (not energy) is conserved.
- The rise after the collision. Energy is conserved.
 
  • #11
so momentum is mvinitial = (m+M)v and after rearranging it will be v= mvinitial/(m+M)
then energy is conserved after collision 1/2(m+M)v^2 = mg(L-Lcosθ)

then we will substitute the value of v from the conservation of momentum equation so it will be
1/2 *mvinitial^2/(m+M) = g(L-Lcosθ)
and then rearranging, vinitial = 2g(m+M)(L-Lcosθ) / m

correct?
 
  • #12
rabiakhan.91 said:
... energy is conserved after collision 1/2(m+M)v^2 = mg(L-Lcosθ)

The PE side of the equation's mass should be (m+M)
 
  • #13
o yes yes! sorry! so
the energy equation after substituting for v will be

[ (m+M) m^2 * vinitial ^2 ] /2(m+M) = (m + M)g (L-Lcostheta)

and then vinitial = [2g(m+M)^2 (L-Lcos theta)] ^1/2 / m
 
  • #14
I didn't get that. Show all steps. At least show what you got for v.
 
  • #15
since momentum is conserved, collision before the moemntum is = after collision
mvinitial = (m+M)v
we rearrange for v so v= m vinitial/ (m+M)

then energy is conserved after the collision so

1/2 (m+M) v^2 = (m+M)g(L-Lcosθ)

then we replace v after collision with initial velocity so we substitute for it from the first equation in the second equation

1/2 (m +M) [m vinitial /(m+M) ] ^2 = (m+M)g (L-Lcosθ)
we simplify it and (m+M) is cancelled

so it becomes
1/2 * (m vinitial)^2 / (m+M) = (m+M) g(L-Lcosθ)

then rearrange (m vinitial)^2 = 2g(m+M)^2 (L-Lcosθ)
then take the square root of both the sides and send m to the other side
vinitial = [ 2g(m+M)^2 (L-Lcosθ) ] ^1/2 / m
vinitial = (m+M) [ 2g(L-Lcosθ ] ^1/2 /m

hope this clears up a little
 
  • #16
Clears it up a lot. Good work by you!
 
  • #17
you have no idea how thankful i am of u!
u have helped me in return of no personal gain!
i am literally moved by your act of kindness!
thank you so so much!
hope all your problems(physics and otherwise :P) work out !


:)
 
  • #18
You are welcome. You wish will be shared by me, Doc_Al, and many others.
 

FAQ: Linear motion converted into rotatory motion problem

How does linear motion get converted into rotatory motion?

Linear motion is converted into rotatory motion through the use of a mechanism called a gearbox or transmission. This mechanism utilizes gears and shafts to transfer the motion from linear to rotational, allowing for the conversion of force and speed.

What is the purpose of converting linear motion into rotatory motion?

The purpose of converting linear motion into rotatory motion is to change the direction of motion from a straight line to a circular motion. This is useful in many applications, such as in vehicles where the engine's linear motion is converted into rotational motion to turn the wheels.

What factors affect the efficiency of converting linear motion into rotatory motion?

The efficiency of converting linear motion into rotatory motion is affected by factors such as the quality and alignment of the gears, the friction between moving parts, and the amount of force being applied.

How can we improve the efficiency of converting linear motion into rotatory motion?

To improve the efficiency of converting linear motion into rotatory motion, we can use high-quality gears, ensure proper alignment of the gears, reduce friction between moving parts through lubrication, and use the appropriate amount of force for the desired speed and torque.

Are there any real-life examples of linear motion being converted into rotatory motion?

Yes, there are many real-life examples of linear motion being converted into rotatory motion, such as in car engines, bicycles, conveyor belts, and power drills. In all of these examples, linear motion is converted into rotational motion through the use of gears and other mechanical components.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top