Linearly independent vs dependent functions

In summary, linearly independent functions are those that cannot be expressed as a linear combination of each other, meaning no function in the set can be written as a weighted sum of the others. Conversely, linearly dependent functions can be expressed as a linear combination of other functions in the set, indicating redundancy. Understanding these concepts is crucial in areas like linear algebra and functional analysis, as they help determine the span and dimensionality of function spaces.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For part(b),
1717397036962.png

My solution is,
##(c_1, c_2, c_3, c_4) = (c_1, 5c_1, -c_1, -3c_1)##

They have taken the case that c_1 = -1, which gives their expression for a linear dependent function as they have shown. However, I'm confused that the functions are linearly dependent for any value of ##c_1 \in \mathbb{R}##. Since if we take ##c_1 = 0##, then ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = c_4 = 0##. I agree thought they the functions are linear dependent for ##c_1 \in \mathbb{R}\{0\} ## (Set of real numbers without zero)

Does someone please know why they did not include that case?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For part(b),
View attachment 346379
My solution is,
##(c_1, c_2, c_3, c_4) = (c_1, 5c_1, -c_1, -3c_1)##

They have taken the case that c_1 = -1, which gives their expression for a linear dependent function as they have shown. However, I'm confused that the functions are linearly dependent for any value of ##c_1 \in \mathbb{R}##. Since if we take ##c_1 = 0##, then ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = c_4 = 0##. I agree thought they the functions are linear dependent for ##c_1 \in \mathbb{R}\{0\} ## (Set of real numbers without zero)

Does someone please know why they did not include that case?

Thanks!
Heya! From the definition of linear dependence, the functions
$$f_1,f_2,...,f_k$$ are linearly dependent if there exist scalars $$a_1,a_2,..,a_k,$$ not all zero, such that
$$a_1f_1+\cdots f_ka_k=0.$$
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #3
ChiralSuperfields said:
They have taken the case that c_1 = -1, which gives their expression for a linear dependent function as they have shown. However, I'm confused that the functions are linearly dependent for any value of ##c_1 \in \mathbb{R}##. Since if we take ##c_1 = 0##, then ##c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = c_4 = 0##. I agree thought they the functions are linear dependent for ##c_1 \in \mathbb{R}\{0\} ## (Set of real numbers without zero)
That is not at all what they are saying. Being linearly dependent means that there is a non-zero solution to
$$
\sum_{i = 1}^4 c_i f_i(t) = 0
$$
and their solution has all ##c_i \neq 0##. It makes no sense to say that the functions are linearly independent for some particular values of ##c_i##. Being linearly independent just means that there exists a non-zero solution for which the above equation holds for all ##t \in \mathbb R## (not ##c_i \in \mathbb R##), which is what they are saying.

Edit: Note: The correct ##\LaTeX## for the set you are referring to (the reals apart from zero) is ##\mathbb R \setminus \{0\}##.
 
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes member 731016 and docnet
  • #4
If ##c1f_1+c_2f_2+ c_3 f_3+ c_4f4=0##, then ##-( c_1f_1+ c2f_2+ c_3f_3+c_4 f_4)=0##. Notice each of your terms is,the negative of those in the solution from the book.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016

FAQ: Linearly independent vs dependent functions

What is the definition of linearly independent functions?

Linearly independent functions are a set of functions such that no function in the set can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. In other words, if you have a set of functions f1, f2, ..., fn, they are linearly independent if the equation c1*f1 + c2*f2 + ... + cn*fn = 0 implies that all coefficients c1, c2, ..., cn must be zero.

What is the definition of linearly dependent functions?

Linearly dependent functions are a set of functions where at least one function can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. This means that there exist constants, not all zero, such that c1*f1 + c2*f2 + ... + cn*fn = 0 holds true for the functions in the set.

How can I determine if a set of functions is linearly independent or dependent?

To determine if a set of functions is linearly independent or dependent, you can set up the equation c1*f1 + c2*f2 + ... + cn*fn = 0 and solve for the coefficients c1, c2, ..., cn. If the only solution is c1 = c2 = ... = cn = 0, the functions are independent. If there is a non-trivial solution (at least one coefficient is not zero), the functions are dependent.

Can you provide an example of linearly independent functions?

An example of linearly independent functions is the set {sin(x), cos(x)}. Neither function can be expressed as a linear combination of the other, and their linear combination equals zero only when the coefficients are both zero.

Can you provide an example of linearly dependent functions?

An example of linearly dependent functions is the set {x, 2x, 3x}. Here, any function can be expressed as a linear combination of the others, such as 2x = 2*1*x + 0*3x, indicating that the functions are dependent.

Similar threads

Back
Top