LLoyd's Mirror Distance Dependence

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex_b93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the formula for irradiance in a Lloyd's mirror interference setup, drawing parallels to the Young Double Slit experiment. The total irradiance for Lloyd's mirror is expressed as I = 4I_0 sin^2(∏ay/λL), highlighting its similarity to the double slit formula. A key distinction is noted: the virtual slit in Lloyd's mirror is out-of-phase by 180 degrees due to reflection, affecting the interference pattern. Participants suggest referring to a diagram from Wikipedia to better understand the angles involved. Overall, clarity on the differences in phase between the setups is crucial for solving the problem.
alex_b93
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering if anyone could help with this problem that I am stuck on?

Homework Statement



I need to work out a formula for the irradiance(intensity) as a function of the distance for a LLoyd's mirror interference arrangement.

The question suggests considering the similarities with the Young Double Slit experiment.

Homework Equations



I know that the total irradiance is given by
I = I_1 + I_2 + [2 (I_1 I_2)^0.5] cos(δ)

I know the total irradiance for the double slit experiment is given by
I = 4I_0 cos^2(∏ay/λL)

I have found that the answer for the Lloyd's mirror is
I = 4I_0 sin^2(∏ay/λL)

So it is clearly very similar.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have the working out for the Young's set up, and I can follow that, but I can't get it to work for the LLoyd's set up, mainly because I can't find a decent diagram for the angles.

Any help or if anybody knows of a decent diagram would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello alex_b93,

The Wikipedia article on Lloyd's mirror, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd%27s_mirror, provides a basic diagram. Think of the distance between the two "slits" (slit's as in Young's experiment) as the distance between the real source and the virtual (reflection) source. The figure in the wiki gives you an idea on how to extrapolate where the virtual source is (by extrapolating the reflection). You'll have to label the angles yourself, but the skeleton of the diagram is there.

There is an important difference between the two slits in Young's experiment, and the two "slits" in Lloyd's experiment (besides one the slits being virtual). In Lloyd's experiment, the virtual "slit" is out-of-phase by 180o, compared to a hypothetical, real slit, all else being equal, due to the reflection. That has a big impact on what ends up as a maxima as opposed to a minima.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K