- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Section 15.4: Localization and am currently working on Proposition 38, part 3 (contraction bijection) - see attachments.
I am hoping that someone can demonstrate a proof of the following propostion (without - as D&F do - referring to or relying on translating the result of Exercise 13, Section 7.4)
c maps prime ideals of \(\displaystyle D^{-1}R \) to prime ideals P of R where \(\displaystyle P \cap D = \emptyset \)
Note: c is a contraction of ideals Q of \(\displaystyle D^{-1}R \) to R defined as folows:
\(\displaystyle c: \ D^{-1}R \to R \)
where
\(\displaystyle c(Q) = \Pi^{-1}(Q) \) where Q is an ideal of \(\displaystyle D^{-1}R \)
Hoping someone can help!
Peter
I am hoping that someone can demonstrate a proof of the following propostion (without - as D&F do - referring to or relying on translating the result of Exercise 13, Section 7.4)
c maps prime ideals of \(\displaystyle D^{-1}R \) to prime ideals P of R where \(\displaystyle P \cap D = \emptyset \)
Note: c is a contraction of ideals Q of \(\displaystyle D^{-1}R \) to R defined as folows:
\(\displaystyle c: \ D^{-1}R \to R \)
where
\(\displaystyle c(Q) = \Pi^{-1}(Q) \) where Q is an ideal of \(\displaystyle D^{-1}R \)
Hoping someone can help!
Peter