MHB Locus of Line Segment Mid Point Intercept Real/Imaginary Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the locus of the midpoint of a line segment that intercepts the real and imaginary axes, defined by the equation a*z̅ + a̅*z + b = 0, where b is a real parameter and a is a fixed complex number with non-zero real and imaginary parts. The participants derive expressions for the intercepts on the axes and subsequently calculate the midpoint. They identify the midpoint as (-b/(4x₀), -b/(4y₀)). The conversation includes corrections regarding the imaginary part of the equation, emphasizing the importance of accurate sign handling in complex equations. The final result provides a clear geometric interpretation of the midpoint's locus.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Find locus of mid point of line segment intercept between real and imaginary axis by the line

$a\bar{z}+\bar{a}z+b=0,$ where $b$ is areal parameter and $a$ is a fixed complex

number such that $\Re(a),\Im(a)\neq 0$

My Attempt:: Let $z=x+iy$ and $a=x_{0}+iy_{0}$, Then put into $a\bar{z}+\bar{a}z+b=0,$

We get $(x_{0}+iy_{0})(x-iy)+(x_{0}-iy_{0})(x+iy)+b=0$

So $(2xx_{0}+2yy_{0}+b)+i(2xy_{0}+2x_{0}y) = 0+i\cdot 0$

So $2xx_{0}+2yy_{0}+b=0$ and $2xy_{0}+2x_{0}y=0$

Now How can i solve it after that, Help me, Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Locus of line sagment

jacks said:
We get $(x_{0}+iy_{0})(x-iy)+(x_{0}-iy_{0})(x+iy)+b=0$

So $(2xx_{0}+2yy_{0}+b)+i(2xy_{0}+2x_{0}y) = 0+i\cdot 0$
You have an error in signs. The imaginary part should be 0 because $a\bar{z}+\bar{a}z=a\bar{z}+\overline{a\bar{z}}=2\text{Re}(a\bar{z})$.
 
Re: Locus of line sagment

jacks said:
Find locus of mid point of line segment intercept between real and imaginary axis by the line

$a\bar{z}+\bar{a}z+b=0,$ where $b$ is areal parameter and $a$ is a fixed complex

number such that $\Re(a),\Im(a)\neq 0$

My Attempt:: Let $z=x+iy$ and $a=x_{0}+iy_{0}$, Then put into $a\bar{z}+\bar{a}z+b=0,$

We get $(x_{0}+iy_{0})(x-iy)+(x_{0}-iy_{0})(x+iy)+b=0$i
$(x_0x0- ix_0y+ ixy_0+ y_0y)+ x_0x+ ix_0y- iy_0x+ y_0y)+ b= 0$
$(2x_0x+ 2y_0y)+ i(-x_0y+ xy_0+ x_0y- y_0x)= 2x_0x+ 2y_0y= 0$

So $(2xx_{0}+2yy_{0}+b)+i(2xy_{0}+2x_{0}y) = 0+i\cdot 0$

So $2xx_{0}+2yy_{0}+b=0$ and $2xy_{0}+2x_{0}y=0$

Now How can i solve it after that, Help me, Thanks
 
jacks said:
Find locus of midpoint of line segment intercept between real and imaginary axis by the line $a\bar{z}+\bar{a}z+b=0,$
where $b$ is a real parameter and $a$ is a fixed complex number such that $\Re(a),\Im(a)\neq 0$
Let $z=x+iy$ and $a=x_o+iy_o$.

Substitute into $a\bar{z}+\bar{a}z+b=0:$
. . $(x_o+iy_o)(x-iy)+(x_o-iy_o)(x+iy)+b\:=\:0$

Expand:
. . . $x_ox - ix_oy + ixy_o + y_oy + x_ox + ix_oy - ixy_o + y_oy + b \:=\:0$

We have: $2x_ox + 2y_oy + b \:=\:0 $

The intercepts are $\left(-\dfrac{b}{2x_o}, 0\right),\;\left(0, -\dfrac{b}{2y_o}\right)$

Their midpoint is: $\left(-\dfrac{b}{4x_o},\,-\dfrac{b}{4y_o}\right)$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top