MHB Logarithm Identity: Prove Loga(1/x)=log1/x(a)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wild ownz al
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The identity Loga(1/x) = log1/x(a) is proven to be false for a > 1 and x > 0. Using the change of base formula, the expressions can be transformed, leading to the conclusion that (ln(a))^2 = (ln(x))^2. This implies ln(a) = ±ln(x), which does not hold true for all values of x and a. A specific example with a = 4 and x = 2 further illustrates the inconsistency of the identity. The discussion concludes that the proposed logarithmic identity cannot be validated.
Wild ownz al
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
If a>1, a cannot = 1, x>0, show that Loga(1/x) = log1/x(a). (COULD NOT SOLVE)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wild ownz al said:
If a>1, a cannot = 1, x>0, show that Loga(1/x) = log1/x(a). (COULD NOT SOLVE)
It's no wonder that you can't solve it. It isn't true!

The change of base formula says
[math]log_a(b) = \dfrac{log_c(b)}{log_c(a)}[/math]

Let us change the base of your expressions to, say, base e. Then
[math]log_a \left (\dfrac{1}{x} \right ) = log_{1/x}(a)[/math]

becomes
[math]\dfrac{ln \left ( \dfrac{1}{x} \right ) }{ln(a)} = \dfrac{ln(a)}{ln \left ( \dfrac{1}{x} \right )}[/math]

or
[math]- \dfrac{ln(x)}{ln(a)} = - \dfrac{ln(a)}{ln(x)}[/math]

[math]( ln(a) )^2 = (ln (x) )^2[/math]

So [math]ln(a) = \pm ln(x)[/math]

Clearly this statement isn't true for all x, a.

If the derivation is a bit much, consider the case a = 4, x = 2. Is [math]log_{1/2}(4) = log_4 \left ( \dfrac{1}{2} \right )[/math]?

-Dan
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top