MHB Logarithmic Equation solve log_(3x)3+log_(x/3)3=5/12

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
AI Thread Summary
To solve the logarithmic equation log_(3x)3 + log_(x/3)3 = 5/12, it's suggested to convert both logarithms to the same base, specifically base 3x. By letting y = log_(x/3)(3), the relationship x^y = 3^(y+1) is established, leading to y = log_(3x)(3^(2y+1)). This results in a transformed equation where y is expressed in terms of log_(3x)(3), ultimately simplifying to y(1 + y/(1 - 2y)) = 5/12. The final step involves solving for y and subsequently for x.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I wish to solve the following logarithmic equation:

\[log_{3x}3+log_{\frac{x}{3}}3=\frac{5}{12}\]

My intuition was to start with changing the base of both logarithms to 10 (or any other number), but couldn't continue from there. Can you assist please ? Is there a meaning to the fact that both bases involves 3 in them ?

Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, you certainly want the two logarithms to the same base but there is nothing special about base 10. Since one logarithm is already to base "3x" I would be inclined to change the other to base 3x also. If y= log_{x/3}(3) then 3= (x/3)^y= x^y/3^y. So x^y= 3^{y+1} and then (3x)^y= 3^yx^y= 3^{2y+ 1}. Taking the logarithm, base 3x, of both sides, y= log_{3x}(3^{2y+1})= (2y+1)log_{3x}(3). Solving that for y, (1- 2log_{3x}(3))y= log_{3x}(3) so y= log_{x/3}(3)= \frac{log_{3x}(3)}{1- 2log_{3x}(3)}

The original equation, log_{3x}(3)+ log_{x/3}(3)= \frac{5}{12} becomes log_{3x}(3)\left(1+ \frac{log_{3x}(3)}{1-2log_{3x}(3)}\right)= \frac{5}{12}.

To simplify, let y= log_{3x}(3) so the equation is y\left(1+ \frac{y}{1- 2y}\right)= \frac{5}{12}. Solve that for y then solve log_{3x}(3)= y for x.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top