- #1
MeesaWorldWide
- 9
- 1
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: Exponential VS Logarithmic Regression (using the TI-84 Plus graphing calculator)
Here is the question:
A scientist examines the growth of bean plants under different growing conditions. The results of one trial are as follows:
Day: 1 3 5 9 11 15
Average height of bean plants (cm) 3.2 4.6 5.4 4.2 5.5 7.1
Determine a logarithmic equation that best represents the data.
I have entered this data into my calculator lists and used logarithmic regression (LnReg) to obtain the equation y = 3.22 + 1.07Lnx
However, the actual answer supposedly requires me to switch the x and y values (inverse), and then use LnReg on that, which produces a different equation: y = -17.30 + 15.60Lnx
I don't understand why I need to switch the x and y values if the data points already trend in a logarithmic fashion. The fact that I was able to use LnReg on the data to get an equation without switching the values should be enough, no? Why is is better to switch x and y first? Why can I not just use the first equation I found (which didn't involve switching anything)?
Thanks in advance for any clarity you can provide.
Here is the question:
A scientist examines the growth of bean plants under different growing conditions. The results of one trial are as follows:
Day: 1 3 5 9 11 15
Average height of bean plants (cm) 3.2 4.6 5.4 4.2 5.5 7.1
Determine a logarithmic equation that best represents the data.
I have entered this data into my calculator lists and used logarithmic regression (LnReg) to obtain the equation y = 3.22 + 1.07Lnx
However, the actual answer supposedly requires me to switch the x and y values (inverse), and then use LnReg on that, which produces a different equation: y = -17.30 + 15.60Lnx
I don't understand why I need to switch the x and y values if the data points already trend in a logarithmic fashion. The fact that I was able to use LnReg on the data to get an equation without switching the values should be enough, no? Why is is better to switch x and y first? Why can I not just use the first equation I found (which didn't involve switching anything)?
Thanks in advance for any clarity you can provide.