I Logarithmic scale - interpolation

AI Thread Summary
To interpolate on a logarithmic scale, the process involves transforming the coordinates of the points into logarithmic values. The formula for linear interpolation can be adapted to logarithmic scales by replacing y values with log(y) and x values with log(x). This allows for the use of the same interpolation method, but the results will be in logarithmic form. After calculating log(y), the original y value can be recovered using the exponential function, y = exp(log(y)). This method effectively allows for accurate interpolation between points on a log-log plot.
FEAnalyst
Messages
348
Reaction score
149
TL;DR Summary
How can I interpolate between two values on a logarithmic scale plot?
Hi,

knowing the coordinates of two points: ##(x_1,y_1)## and ##(x_2,y_2)## on a linear scale plot, I can use linear interpolation to get ##y## for a point of known ##x## using the formula below: $$y=y_1+(x−x_1) \frac{(y_2−y_1)}{(x_2−x_1)}$$
But how does it look like in the case of logarithmic scale (log-log plot)? How can I get ##y## for known ##x## when I have the coordinates of two other points? So far I haven't found any working formula for that.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
FEAnalyst said:
when I have the coordinates of two other points?
You have to specify what you mean by that ! Example: Plot ##y = x^3## on log-log paper. Suppose you want to interpolate between ##(3,27)## and ##(4,64)## to find ##3.75^3## (is 52.73).

1619110562193.png


Do you have the coordinates of those points as found on the axis, or in mm on the paper ?

In the first case your $$y-y1=(x−x_1) \frac{(y_2−y_1)}{(x_2−x_1)}$$is still 'valid' in the logarithm world$$
\log{y\over y_1} = \log{x\over x_1}*{\log(y_2/y_1)\over \log(x_2/x_1)}$$as you can easily check with a calculator (or excel ?:) ):
1619109772500.png


In the second case you do something similar, but you already have the logarithms.
1619110493181.png


##\ ##
 
Just replace all y values by log(y) and all x-values by log(x). That's all. That's exactly what a log-log plot does. Your result is then log(y), but of course you can recover y using y = exp(log(y)).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top