- #1
duraluminium
- 3
- 0
Greetings everyone!
I have been reading the forums for a while now, however I have just registered and this will make my first post.
While thinking of a science fiction novel that takes place in contaminated setting, originating from our day world, I have found myself stuck on how to provide a scientifically justifiable explenation on how the contamination came to be.
"Mad science Q&A" are abundant on the internet, but read as I might, I can not identify the bellow clearly.
I already did some reasearch on radiation, nuclear disasters, etc. and came up with the frame within which I hope to identify a single radioactive element of the following properties:
a) half-life of 7000+ years (preferabely at least twice that but that's the minimum i hope for)
b) alpha/beta (preferabely both, but if i have to make a pick, then beta) radioactive decay, sufficient to deliver a terminal dose within hours of internal exposure (breathing in unseen dust particles), resulting in death after around 14 to 30 days. Other radiation that is harder to shield from is not desirable
c) Sufficient quantities to cover the entire surface of the Earth (thinking fallout) with more of the dust drifting in the atmosphere. Not necesserily available on Earth in such quantities and can be of an extraterestrial origin - an asteroid of some sort or some other form of cataclysmic delivery (supernova debri, or some quantum experiment involving matter discharge from the sun gone terribly terribly worng, perhaps?)
In addition to the above, I have some general things i want to ask:
Coud (in theory)alpha/beta radiation be held back by a strong enough electromagnetic field?
Radiation does not mess with unshielded electronic devices, right?
Basically I am looking to (semi)scientifically justify a Chernobyl (city of Pripyat) like radioactive environment (with, relatively speaking, more immidiate consequences for the misfortunate individual that strides into it unprotected) that prevents people living in spaces open to radioactive dust, thus calling for more drastic measures, alternating the way people live by forcing them into long term (a few 1000 years) refuge in large confined spaces, but letting them walk around in the open if wearing protective clothing.
Would radiation in the above scenario (before the half-life period is reached) steadily decrese? If it would, how long before the half-life point would it be at human-tolerable levels (i.e. so that the deadly dose exposure time would go from a few hours to a week or something?).
I would really like to get a better picture on how a cataclysmic nuclear event would influence our civilisation on a few thousand year scale. Would we in compharison plunge into a modern medival age (contless hollywood plots) lasting until the half-life point or would we be back on our feet in a few decades / a century? The scene I'd like to give a logical history to would be survival through use of present and future technology, but with limitations (technological, economical and sheer size) on just how much area could be sheltered.
I kindly ask for your suggestions.
Cheers
I have been reading the forums for a while now, however I have just registered and this will make my first post.
While thinking of a science fiction novel that takes place in contaminated setting, originating from our day world, I have found myself stuck on how to provide a scientifically justifiable explenation on how the contamination came to be.
"Mad science Q&A" are abundant on the internet, but read as I might, I can not identify the bellow clearly.
I already did some reasearch on radiation, nuclear disasters, etc. and came up with the frame within which I hope to identify a single radioactive element of the following properties:
a) half-life of 7000+ years (preferabely at least twice that but that's the minimum i hope for)
b) alpha/beta (preferabely both, but if i have to make a pick, then beta) radioactive decay, sufficient to deliver a terminal dose within hours of internal exposure (breathing in unseen dust particles), resulting in death after around 14 to 30 days. Other radiation that is harder to shield from is not desirable
c) Sufficient quantities to cover the entire surface of the Earth (thinking fallout) with more of the dust drifting in the atmosphere. Not necesserily available on Earth in such quantities and can be of an extraterestrial origin - an asteroid of some sort or some other form of cataclysmic delivery (supernova debri, or some quantum experiment involving matter discharge from the sun gone terribly terribly worng, perhaps?)
In addition to the above, I have some general things i want to ask:
Coud (in theory)alpha/beta radiation be held back by a strong enough electromagnetic field?
Radiation does not mess with unshielded electronic devices, right?
Basically I am looking to (semi)scientifically justify a Chernobyl (city of Pripyat) like radioactive environment (with, relatively speaking, more immidiate consequences for the misfortunate individual that strides into it unprotected) that prevents people living in spaces open to radioactive dust, thus calling for more drastic measures, alternating the way people live by forcing them into long term (a few 1000 years) refuge in large confined spaces, but letting them walk around in the open if wearing protective clothing.
Would radiation in the above scenario (before the half-life period is reached) steadily decrese? If it would, how long before the half-life point would it be at human-tolerable levels (i.e. so that the deadly dose exposure time would go from a few hours to a week or something?).
I would really like to get a better picture on how a cataclysmic nuclear event would influence our civilisation on a few thousand year scale. Would we in compharison plunge into a modern medival age (contless hollywood plots) lasting until the half-life point or would we be back on our feet in a few decades / a century? The scene I'd like to give a logical history to would be survival through use of present and future technology, but with limitations (technological, economical and sheer size) on just how much area could be sheltered.
I kindly ask for your suggestions.
Cheers