- #1
JD_PM
- 1,131
- 158
- Homework Statement
- Given a quantum field theory whose potential is given by
$$V(\phi) = g \frac{\phi^3}{3!} + \lambda \frac{\phi^4}{4!}$$
Find all connected one and two-loop graphs (to do so you will need to find all symmetry factors involved) which contribute to
\begin{equation*}
\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle, \qquad \langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \phi(x_3)\rangle
\end{equation*}
- Relevant Equations
- N/A
My understanding of the n-correlation function is
\begin{equation*}
\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) ... \phi(x_n)\rangle = i \Delta_F (x_1-x_2-...-x_n)
\end{equation*}
Where ##\Delta_F## is known as the Feynman propagator (in Mathematics is better known as Green's function).
Let us analyze ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle## first. Conventionally, the ##\Delta_F(x_1−x_2)## propagator is drawn as a line
OK. But then I see that the second contribution is given by a diagram with a 'bubble' in between, with a symmetry factor of ##2## attached to it
Regarding the symmetry factor ##S=2## attached to the bubble diagram.
This is how I approached it (highly inspired by the accepted answer here) : Let's start with the external leg on the left. There are two possibilities for this external leg to attach: it can attach to either ##z## or ##w##. The right external leg is thus left with only one possibility. Hence we have a ##2 \times 1## factor. We could start from right to left instead so, by the same token, we pick up another ##2 \times 1## factor. The upper internal leg can either attach to ##z## or ##w## while the lower is left with one option only; we hence pick up a ##2 \times 1## factor. We could start with the lower internal leg instead so, by the same token, we pick up another ##2 \times 1## factor (still thinking about the argument used for the internal legs...).
Overall, the Dyson series gives us a ##1/2!## factor and the two vertices give ##1/(2!2!)## so the symmetry factor I get is
$$\frac{2\times 1 \times 2\times 1 \times 2\times 1 \times 2\times 1}{2!2!2!}=2$$
My doubts are
1) Why does this 'bubble' contribution emerge?
2) What are the specific Feynman rules that allow us to write down all contributions?
Once I fully understand how ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle## works, I should be able to show all contributions for ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \phi(x_3) \rangle##
@vanhees71 @Gaussian97 , might you have time to discuss this one?
Thank you
Source: Osborn notes
PS: ##\phi^3+\phi^4## theory was discussed in this enlightening thread.
\begin{equation*}
\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) ... \phi(x_n)\rangle = i \Delta_F (x_1-x_2-...-x_n)
\end{equation*}
Where ##\Delta_F## is known as the Feynman propagator (in Mathematics is better known as Green's function).
Let us analyze ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle## first. Conventionally, the ##\Delta_F(x_1−x_2)## propagator is drawn as a line
OK. But then I see that the second contribution is given by a diagram with a 'bubble' in between, with a symmetry factor of ##2## attached to it
Regarding the symmetry factor ##S=2## attached to the bubble diagram.
This is how I approached it (highly inspired by the accepted answer here) : Let's start with the external leg on the left. There are two possibilities for this external leg to attach: it can attach to either ##z## or ##w##. The right external leg is thus left with only one possibility. Hence we have a ##2 \times 1## factor. We could start from right to left instead so, by the same token, we pick up another ##2 \times 1## factor. The upper internal leg can either attach to ##z## or ##w## while the lower is left with one option only; we hence pick up a ##2 \times 1## factor. We could start with the lower internal leg instead so, by the same token, we pick up another ##2 \times 1## factor (still thinking about the argument used for the internal legs...).
Overall, the Dyson series gives us a ##1/2!## factor and the two vertices give ##1/(2!2!)## so the symmetry factor I get is
$$\frac{2\times 1 \times 2\times 1 \times 2\times 1 \times 2\times 1}{2!2!2!}=2$$
My doubts are
1) Why does this 'bubble' contribution emerge?
2) What are the specific Feynman rules that allow us to write down all contributions?
Once I fully understand how ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \rangle## works, I should be able to show all contributions for ##\langle \phi(x_1) \phi(x_2) \phi(x_3) \rangle##
@vanhees71 @Gaussian97 , might you have time to discuss this one?
Thank you
Source: Osborn notes
PS: ##\phi^3+\phi^4## theory was discussed in this enlightening thread.
Last edited: