Luca's question via email about a line integral....

In summary, the line integral evaluates to approximately 166.385072 and is independent of the path. The original integrand must be "exact" and can be written as the differential of a function, F(x, y, z), which can be evaluated at the limits of integration. The final result is 249+ \frac{3\pi^2}{5}- e^{9/2}.
  • #1
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
1,465
24
Evaluate the line integral $\displaystyle \begin{align*} I = \int_{(0,0,0)}^{\left( 5, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2} \right) }{ 6\,x^2\,\mathrm{d}x + \left[ 6\,z^2 + 9\,\mathrm{e}^{9\,y} \cos{ \left( 10\,z \right) } \right] \,\mathrm{d}y + \left[ 12\,y\,z - 10 \,\mathrm{e}^{9\,y}\sin{ \left( 10\,z \right) } \right] \,\mathrm{d}z } \end{align*}$

I am assuming that this line integral is along the straight line from $\displaystyle \begin{align*} (0,0,0) \end{align*}$ to $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( 5, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2} \right) \end{align*}$, which has equation $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( x, y, z \right) = t\left( 5, \frac{1}{2} , \frac{\pi}{2} \right) \, , \,t \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] \end{align*}$, so

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} x &= 5\,t \implies \mathrm{d}x = 5\,\mathrm{d}t \\ y &= \frac{1}{2}\,t \implies \mathrm{d}y = \frac{1}{2}\,\mathrm{d}t \\ z &= \frac{\pi}{2}\,t \implies \mathrm{d}z = \frac{\pi}{2}\,\mathrm{d}t \end{align*}$

and so the integral becomes

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} I &= \int_{t=0}^{t=1}{ 6\left( 5\,t \right) ^2 \cdot 5\,\mathrm{d}t + \left[ 6\left( \frac{\pi}{2}\,t \right) ^2 + 9\,\mathrm{e}^{9 \cdot \frac{1}{2}\,t} \cos{ \left( 10 \cdot \frac{\pi}{2}\,t \right) } \right] \cdot \frac{1}{2}\,\mathrm{d}t + \left[ 12 \cdot \frac{1}{2}\,t \cdot \frac{\pi}{2}\,t - 10 \,\mathrm{e}^{ 9 \cdot \frac{1}{2}\,t } \sin{ \left( 10\cdot \frac{\pi}{2}\,t \right) } \right] \cdot \frac{\pi}{2}\,\mathrm{d}t } \\ &= \int_0^1{ \left[ 750\,t^2 + \frac{3\,\pi ^2}{4}\,t^2 + \frac{9}{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}\,t} \cos{ \left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } + \frac{3\,\pi ^2}{2} \, t^2 - 5\,\pi\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}\,t}\sin{\left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } \right] \,\mathrm{d}t } \\ &= \int_0^1{ \left[ \left( \frac{3000 + 9\,\pi^2}{4} \right) t^2 + \frac{9}{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}\,t}\cos{\left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } - 5\,\pi\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}\,t}\sin{ \left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } \right] \,\mathrm{d}t } \\ &= \left\{ \left( \frac{1000 + 3\,\pi^2}{4} \right) t^3 + \frac{9}{2} \left[ \frac{\mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}\,t}}{\left( \frac{9}{2} \right) ^2 + \left( 5\,\pi \right) ^2} \right] \left[ \frac{9}{2} \, \cos{ \left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } + 5\,\pi \sin{ \left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } \right] - 5\,\pi \left[ \frac{ \mathrm{e}^{ \frac{9}{2} \,t } }{ \left( \frac{9}{2} \right) ^2 + \left( 5\,\pi \right) ^2 } \right] \left[ \frac{9}{2} \, \sin{ \left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } - 5\,\pi \cos{ \left( 5 \, \pi \, t \right) } \right] \right\} _0^1 \\ &= \left\{ \left( \frac{1000 + 3\,\pi ^2}{4} \right) t^3 + \left[ \frac{4\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}\,t}}{81 + 100\,\pi^2} \right] \left[ \left( \frac{81 + 100\,\pi ^2}{4} \right) \cos{ \left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } \right] \right\} _0^1 \\ &= \left[ \left( \frac{1000 + 3\,\pi ^2}{4} \right) t^3 + \mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}\,t} \cos{ \left( 5\,\pi\,t \right) } \right] _0^1 \\ &= \frac{1000 + 3\,\pi ^2}{4} - \mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}} - 1 \\ &= \frac{996 + 3\,\pi ^2 - 4\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{9}{2}}}{4} \\ &\approx 166.385\,072 \end{align*}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Assuming that the integral is independent of the path (which you would need to do since no path is specified) another good choice would be the line, along the x-axis, from (0, 0, 0) to (5, 0, 0) then the line, parallel to the y-axis, from (5, 0, 0) to (5, 1/2, 0), then along the line, parallel to the z-axis, from (5, 1/2, 0) to (5, 1/2, pi/2).

On the first part, only x changes so dy and dz are 0. The integral becomes
[tex]\int_0^5 6x^2 dx= \left[2x^3\right]_0^5= 250[/tex].

On the second part, only y changes so dx and dz are 0. x is the constant, 5, and z is 0. The integral becomes [tex]\int_0^{1/2} 9e^{9y}dy= \left[e^{9y}\right]_0^{1/2}= e^{9/2}- 1[/tex].

On the third part, only z changes so dx and dy are 0. x is the constant, 5, and y is the constant, 1/2. The integral becomes [tex]\int_0^{\pi/2} 6z+ 10e^{9/2} sin(10z)dz= \left[3z^2- e^{9/2}cos(10z)\right]_0^{\pi/2}= \frac{3\pi^2}{4}+ 2e^{9/2}[/tex].

The original integral is the sum of those, [tex]249+ \frac{3\pi^2}{4}+ 3e^{9/2}[/tex].

(Better check my arithmetic.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
[FONT=MathJax_Size1]Of course, if the integral is independent of the path then the integrand, \(\displaystyle 6x^2 dx+ (6z^2+ 9e^{9y}cos(10z))dy+ (12yz- 10e^{9y} sin(10z)dz\), must be "exact"- that is, there exist some differentiable function, F(x, y, z), such that the differential is \(\displaystyle dF= 6x^2 dx+ (6z^2+ 9e^{9y}cos(10z))dy+ (12yz- 10e^{9y} sin(10z)dz\) and the integral is just F evaluated at the limits of integration.

In that case, we must have \(\displaystyle \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}= 6x^2\) so that \(\displaystyle F= 2x^3\) plus a "constant". But since the differentiation is with respect to x only, that "constant" can be an arbitrary function of y and z. That is, \(\displaystyle F(x,y,z)= 2x^3+ G(y, z)\).

Differentiating with respect to y, \(\displaystyle \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}= \frac{\partial G}{\partial y}\) and that must be equal to \(\displaystyle 6z^2+ 9e^{9y}cos(10z)\).

Integrating \(\displaystyle \frac{\partial G}{\partial y}= 6z^2+ 9e^{9y}cos(10z)\) with respect to y, \(\displaystyle G(y,z)= 6yz^2+ e^{9y}cos(10z)+ H(z)\) where, now, the "constant of integration" must be a differentiable function of z only.

So \(\displaystyle F(x,y,z)= 2x^3+ 6yz^2+ e^{9y}cos(10z)+ H(z)\). Differentiating that with respect to z, \(\displaystyle \frac{\partial F}{\partial z}= 12yz- 10e^{9y}sin(10z)+ \frac{dH}{dz}= 12yz- 10e^{9y} sin(10z)\) so that [tex]\frac{dH}{dz}= 0[/tex] and H really is a constant. (And this integral really is independent of the path.)

We have \(\displaystyle F(x,y,z)= 2x^3+ 6yz^2+ e^{9y}cos(10z)+ C\) and need to evaluate that at \(\displaystyle (0, 0, 0)\) and \(\displaystyle (5, 1/2, \pi/2)\).

\(\displaystyle F(0,0,0)= 1+ C\) and \(\displaystyle F(5,1/2,\pi/2)= 250+3\pi^2/4- e^{9/2}+ C\) so the integral is \(\displaystyle 249+ \frac{3\pi^2}{5}- e^{9/2}\)

[/FONT]
 

FAQ: Luca's question via email about a line integral....

1. What is a line integral?

A line integral is a type of integral that is used to calculate the total value of a scalar or vector field along a specific curve or path in a given space.

2. How is a line integral different from a regular integral?

A regular integral calculates the area under a curve in a two-dimensional space, while a line integral calculates the total value of a field along a specific path in a multi-dimensional space.

3. How is a line integral calculated?

To calculate a line integral, you first need to parameterize the given curve or path and then integrate the value of the field function along the path with respect to the parameter.

4. What is the purpose of a line integral?

A line integral is used to calculate the total value of a field along a specific path, which can be useful in many applications such as calculating work done by a force, calculating flux through a surface, or calculating mass flow rate in a fluid.

5. Can a line integral be calculated in any coordinate system?

Yes, a line integral can be calculated in any coordinate system as long as the path is properly parameterized and the field function is defined in that coordinate system.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top