Magnetic Field of a long straight wire

Click For Summary
To calculate the magnetic field in a square loop due to a long straight wire with a time-varying current, the Biot-Savart law is preferred over Ampere's law. The magnetic field can be expressed as B = (μ₀ I(t))/(2πρ) in cylindrical coordinates, where ρ is the radial distance from the wire. The total magnetic flux through the loop requires defining an area element and integrating the magnetic field over the specified limits, avoiding the singularity at ρ = 0. After computing the flux, the electromotive force (emf) can be determined by differentiating the current with respect to time. This approach effectively handles the complexities of the magnetic field and flux in the given scenario.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
for the figure
a=12cm, b= 16cm
The current in a long straight wire is given by i = (4.5 A/s^2)t^2 - (10A/s)t. Find the emf in the square loop at t=3.0s
now i was wondering how one would go about caluclating hte B in the square loop.
Would i use the biot savart law or Ampere's law?
I have a feeling it is ampere's law so that
\oint B \bullet ds = \mu_{0} i
but then what is ds? The amperian loop in thsi case would be a cylinder that encompasses the whole square and more...
Please help on this
thank you for the help
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    11.7 KB · Views: 486
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Skip Ampere and Biot-Savart, unless you've never derived the result for the magnetic field from an infinite straight wire before! Here's the result:
<br /> \begin{equation}<br /> \mathbf{B} = \frac{\mu_0 I(t)}{2\pi \rho} \hat{\phi} \, ;<br /> \end{equation}<br />
\rho is the radial coordinate (in cylindrical coordinates). Now take this result, and forget about Ampere's law. You need to compute the flux in the loop.
First notice that (1) is singular at \rho = 0. Second: we need to define an area element, since the total flux is written in terms of a surface integral. The area element
is d\rho \, dz \hat{\phi}, and so
<br /> \text{Flux } = \int \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{A} = +\int_0^b \int_\epsilon^{b-a} \frac{\mu_0 I(t)}{2\pi \rho} \, d\rho \, dz - \int_0^b \int_\epsilon^a \frac{\mu_0 I(t)}{2\pi \rho} \, d\rho \, dz\, .<br />
We're taking care of the problem at zero by coming arbitrarily close to the wire, but never integrating across it. (Why is there a minus sign in the second integral?)
The epsilons should cancel, and your result should be dimensionally correct. Now that you have the flux, go ahead and differentiate the current with respect to time to get
\mathcal{E}.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K