Magnetic Field of an infinite current-carrying wire at a point

In summary, the magnetic field generated by an infinite current-carrying wire can be determined using Ampère's Law. The magnetic field (B) at a point located at a distance (r) from the wire is given by the formula B = (μ₀I)/(2πr), where μ₀ is the permeability of free space and I is the current flowing through the wire. The direction of the magnetic field follows the right-hand rule, encircling the wire in a circular pattern. This field is uniform and decreases inversely with distance from the wire, highlighting the relationship between current, distance, and magnetic field strength.
  • #1
BuggyWungos
13
1
Homework Statement
Find the magnetic field strength at point P (illustration below)
Relevant Equations
$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}\times\hat{r}}{r^2}$$
1722637413099.png

My attempt:

$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}r\sin{\theta}}{r^2}$$

$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}\sin{\theta}}{r}$$
$$ \sin{\theta} = \dfrac{y}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}$$

$$ d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}}{r}\dfrac{y}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}$$
$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Id\vec{l}y}{r^2}$$


$$d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Iyd\vec{l}}{r^2}$$



This is what I determined to be the magnetic force at P due to ##d\vec{I}##


$$B(r) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\vec{B}(r)$$


$$B(r) =\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Iyd\vec{l}}{r^2}$$


$$B(r) =\dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\dfrac{Iy\vec{l}}{r^2} \Big|_{-\infty}^{+\infty}$$

I don't think my solution is solvable, it just becomes positive infinity minus negative infinity

My professor had a different solution to ##d\vec{B}(r)##

1722638606476.png


I don't understand where ##r## went and how ##dx## was brought forth in the second step :oldconfused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Please fix your LaTeX and make it legible.
BuggyWungos said:
My professor had a different solution to ##d\vec{B}(r)##

View attachment 349372

I don't understand where ##r## went and how ##dx## was brought forth in the second step :oldconfused:
##r## didn't go anywhere. It is still there as ##\sqrt{x^2+y^2}.##
##d\vec l## is an element in the direction of the current. Its magnitude in this case is ##dx##.
 
  • #3
kuruman said:
Please fix you LaTeX and make it legible.

##r## didn't go anywhere. It is still there as ##\sqrt{x^2+y^2}.##
##d\vec l## is an element in the direction of the current. Its magnitude in this case is ##dx##.
I'm surprised you were able to understand all that before I fixed it.

I understand the second part of your comment, but where is ##\sqrt{x^2+y^2}## in the second step of my prof's solution?

Edit: I would have expected it to end up like ##d\vec{B}(r) = \dfrac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \dfrac{Idx\sin{\theta}}{r}##
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #4
@BuggyWungos, note that in the expression
##~~~~\dfrac {\mu_0}{4 \pi} \dfrac {I \vec {dl} \times \hat r}{r^2}##
##\hat r## is the unit vector in the r-direction; it’s magnitude is ##1##. Don't confuse it with ##\vec r##.
 
  • #5
Steve4Physics said:
@BuggyWungos, note that in the expression
##~~~~\dfrac {\mu_0}{4 \pi} \dfrac {I \vec {dl} \times \hat r}{r^2}##
##\hat r## is the unit vector in the r-direction; it’s magnitude is ##1##. Don't confuse it with ##\vec r##.
:bow:
Thank you that's such a silly oversight, I even wrote it as r hat in latex and missed it lol
 
Back
Top