Magnetism and radiation as a consequence of SR

In summary, special relativity (SR) predicts that objects moving at high speeds will experience the effects of length contraction and time dilation. This also leads to the concept of relativistic mass, where an object's mass increases as it approaches the speed of light. Additionally, magnetism and radiation are consequences of SR, as moving charges experience a magnetic force and emit radiation. These phenomena can be explained through the Lorentz transformation, which describes how measurements of space and time change for observers in different frames of reference. Overall, SR provides a fundamental understanding of how the laws of physics behave in the presence of high speeds and has many practical applications in modern technology.
  • #1
jainabhs
31
0
Please refer the doc attached.
The document is available at http://physics.weber.edu/schroeder/mrr/MRRhandout.pdf

It explains magnetism and radiation as a consequence of SR.
In the section for magnetism, it is depicted that, with respect to test charge Q, the distance between the -q charges gets contracted. That is fine. But why do they say that distance between +q charges has increased. Why is that?
According to me, only the distance between -q charges should decrease and the distance between +q charges should remain constant as they are not in motion w.r.t test charge Q. And length contraction for -q charges is sufficient to explain charge imbalance in the conductor,in turn, applying attraction to test charge Q

Please explain...thanks in anticipation
 

Attachments

  • mag_radiation_SR.pdf
    48.5 KB · Views: 305
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here's how you work out the charge distribution. Assume an ideal wire, so that its potential is zero. A real wire will have some small resistance which complicates the analysis, but it can be safely ignored by setting the resistance to zero and eliminating this complicating factor.

Solve for the electric field given the boundary conditions that the potential of the wire is zero. This is very easy - the electric field is the gradient of the potential, and the potential can be taken to be zero everywhere (on and off the wire). Note that this makes an additional assumption - that the wire started out with no net charge in order for us to say it had a zero potential.

So now that we've established that the electric field around a perfectly conducting uncharged wire is zero regardles of whether it's carrying currnet, you can find the charge densities and how they transform by Gauss law. The correct solution for charge densities will have no electric field in the laboratory frame. Thus in the laboratory frame, the two charge densities must be equal. This leads to the results described in the paper when viewed in the rest frame of the wire.
 
  • #3


Thank you for your question. The document you have provided is a handout by Dr. Daniel Schroeder from Weber State University, which discusses the effects of special relativity (SR) on magnetism and radiation. In order to understand why the distance between the +q charges increases in the presence of a test charge, it is important to understand the concept of length contraction in SR.

Length contraction is a phenomenon that occurs when an object moves at high speeds relative to an observer. According to SR, the length of an object in the direction of its motion will appear shorter to an observer in a different frame of reference. This effect is a consequence of the fact that the speed of light is constant for all observers, regardless of their relative motion.

Now, let us consider the scenario described in the document where a test charge Q is moving with a constant velocity v relative to a conductor with two stationary charges, +q and -q. As Q moves closer to the conductor, the distance between the -q charges appears to decrease due to length contraction. This is because the -q charges are moving towards Q and are therefore affected by length contraction. However, the +q charges are stationary and not affected by length contraction. So why does the document state that the distance between the +q charges increases?

The answer lies in the fact that the distance between the +q charges increases from the perspective of the test charge Q. In other words, the distance between the +q charges appears to increase for Q because it is moving towards them at a high speed. This is a consequence of length contraction and can be explained using the Lorentz transformation equations in SR.

In conclusion, the document is correct in stating that the distance between the +q charges increases from the perspective of the test charge Q due to length contraction. This effect, along with the length contraction of the -q charges, results in a net charge imbalance in the conductor and leads to the observed attraction between the test charge Q and the conductor. I hope this helps to clarify your confusion.
 

Related to Magnetism and radiation as a consequence of SR

1. How does special relativity (SR) explain magnetism?

According to SR, electric and magnetic fields are two aspects of the same phenomenon. When an electrically charged object moves, it creates a magnetic field perpendicular to its motion. This is known as the magnetic force and is described by the Lorentz force law. SR also explains that as an object moves faster, it experiences a greater length contraction, causing its electric field to rotate and appear as a magnetic field to an observer.

2. What is the relationship between magnetism and radiation?

Magnetism and radiation are closely related phenomena. When an electrically charged particle is accelerated, it emits electromagnetic radiation. This radiation can take the form of light, radio waves, or even X-rays. In addition, the presence of a magnetic field can alter the path of charged particles, causing them to emit radiation in different directions.

3. How does SR affect the behavior of charged particles in a magnetic field?

SR predicts that as a charged particle moves faster, it experiences a greater length contraction and time dilation. This means that the particle's path will be curved more in a magnetic field and it will take longer to complete a full circle. Additionally, SR explains that the strength of the magnetic field will affect the radius of the particle's path, with a stronger field causing a smaller radius.

4. Can SR explain the phenomenon of electromagnetic waves?

Yes, SR provides a theoretical framework for understanding electromagnetic waves. According to SR, a changing electric field creates a magnetic field and vice versa. This creates a self-sustaining wave that propagates through space at the speed of light. This is known as an electromagnetic wave and is responsible for all forms of electromagnetic radiation.

5. How does SR affect our understanding of the relationship between electricity and magnetism?

Before SR, electricity and magnetism were thought of as separate and unrelated phenomena. However, SR explains that they are two different aspects of the same force. This has led to a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws of electromagnetism and has allowed for the development of technologies such as electric motors and generators, which use the relationship between electricity and magnetism to function.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
391
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
Back
Top