Magnitude of en electric field and electrostatic field

In summary: The \mathcal{GS} I am using is a spherical shell with an inner radius of a and an outer radius of b. The charge enclosed by the shell is Q.
  • #1
katrascythe
5
0

Homework Statement



I have a solid, insulating, finite-thickness spherical shell (inner radius a, outer radius b). It's uniformly charged with a total charge of Q. I'm looking for the electric field E, "everywhere in space, including points outside and inside the spherical shell"

Also, I'm looking for the electrostatic potential of the inner and outer surface of the shell

Homework Equations



E = (1/4pie0)(Q/r^2)r

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm pretty much lost on this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[tex]\vec{E}(\vec{r})=\frac{1}{4 \pi {\epsilon}_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \hat{r}[/tex]

is the electric field due to a point charge at the origin.

What is the expression for the electric field due to a surface charge [tex]\sigma[/tex]?

Have you learned Gauss's law yet?
 
  • #3
Yes, we've learned Gauss' law but I'm unsure how to apply it to the problem.

Due to the surface charge sigma wouldn't the equation be (2*pi*(radius)^2*sigma)/epsilon?
 
  • #4
katrascythe said:
Yes, we've learned Gauss' law but I'm unsure how to apply it to the problem.

Due to the surface charge sigma wouldn't the equation be (2*pi*(radius)^2*sigma)/epsilon?

No, the correct formula for calculating the electric field due to a surface charge [itex]\sigma (\vec{r'})[/itex] is:

[tex] \vec{E}(\vec{r})=\frac{1}{4 \pi {\epsilon}_0} \int_{\mathcal{S}} \frac{\sigma (\vec{r'})}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|^2} \widehat{\vec{r}-\vec{r'}} da'[/tex]

Where [itex]|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|[/itex] is the distance between an infinitesimal piece, dq, of the surface charge located at [itex]\vec{r'}[/itex] and the field point [itex]\vec{r}[/itex]. And [itex]\hat{\vec{r}-\vec{r'}}[/itex] is the unit vector pointing from the infinitesimal source dq, to the field point.

Such integrals are usually very difficult to evaluate, so I recommend using Gauss's Law if you can...what types of symmetry can Gauss's law be used for? What type of symmetry is present in the given problem?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Gauss' law can be used for cylindrical, spherical, and planar symmetry. So here there is spherical symmetry. Looking this up gives me the equation of

E = (QA)/(4*pi*epsilon_o*r^2)
 
  • #6
Okay, but what is Q_enclosed inside the spherical shell? How about outside? (I'm assuming you meant Q_enclosed by Q_a)

Did you just look up this answer or did you calculate yourself using Gauss's law?
 
  • #7
Hi gabbagabbahey ! :smile:

In the middle of text, the PF server doesn't like a lot of ordinary LaTeX, so use itex and /itex instead of tex and /tex (for "inline LaTeX"): :wink:

Where [itex]|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|[/itex] is the distance between an infinitesimal piece, dq, of the surface charge located at [itex]\vec{r'}[/itex] and the field point [itex]\vec{r}[/itex]. And [itex]\widehat{\vec{r}-\vec{r'}}[/itex] is the unit vector pointing from the infinitesimal source dq, to the field point.
 
  • #8
I was able to get the equation through a few equations we have in our notes. Gauss' Law is phi = Q/epsilon_0. The magnitude within each sphere would be constant, so phi is the integral of E*ds. That gives 4*pi*r^2*E.

Setting the equations equal to each other is 4*pi*r^2*E = Q/epsilon_0

Solving for E is how I got the equation.

I meant the QA as the Q enclosed by the inner shell, sorry. And the outer shell would be QB.
 
  • #9
tiny-tim said:
Hi gabbagabbahey ! :smile:

In the middle of text, the PF server doesn't like a lot of ordinary LaTeX, so use itex and /itex instead of tex and /tex (for "inline LaTeX"): :wink:

Thanks for the tip tiny tim:smile:
 
  • #10
katrascythe said:
I was able to get the equation through a few equations we have in our notes. Gauss' Law is phi = Q/epsilon_0. The magnitude within each sphere would be constant, so phi is the integral of E*ds. That gives 4*pi*r^2*E.

Setting the equations equal to each other is 4*pi*r^2*E = Q/epsilon_0

Solving for E is how I got the equation.

I meant the QA as the Q enclosed by the inner shell, sorry. And the outer shell would be QB.

Well, Gauss's law in integral form is:

[tex]\Phi= \oint_{\mathcal{GS}} \vec{E} \cdot \vec{da} =\frac{Q_{enclosed}}{{\epsilon}_0}[/tex]

Where [itex]\mathcal{GS}[/itex] is your Gaussian surface and [itex]Q_{enclosed}[/itex] is the charge enclosed by your Gaussian surface.

so, what are you using for your [itex]\mathcal{GS}[/itex]? how much charge does it enclose when its radius [itex]r[/itex] is less than [itex]a[/itex]?
 

FAQ: Magnitude of en electric field and electrostatic field

What is the difference between electric field and electrostatic field?

The electric field refers to the force per unit charge experienced by a charged particle in an electric field. On the other hand, the electrostatic field refers to the electric field produced by stationary charges. Essentially, the electrostatic field is a type of electric field that remains constant over time.

How is the magnitude of an electric field calculated?

The magnitude of an electric field is calculated by dividing the force exerted on a test charge by the magnitude of the test charge. Mathematically, it can be represented as E = F/q, where E is the electric field, F is the force, and q is the test charge.

What factors affect the magnitude of an electric field?

The magnitude of an electric field is affected by the distance from the source charge, the magnitude of the source charge, and the medium in which the electric field exists. The electric field decreases with distance and increases with the magnitude of the source charge.

Can the magnitude of an electric field be negative?

Yes, the magnitude of an electric field can be negative. This indicates that the electric field is pointing in the opposite direction to the positive charge. However, the magnitude of the electric field is always represented as a positive value.

How is the magnitude of an electrostatic field different from a magnetic field?

The magnitude of an electrostatic field is affected by stationary charges, while the magnitude of a magnetic field is affected by moving charges. Additionally, electrostatic fields are typically stronger than magnetic fields and do not have a direction, whereas magnetic fields have both magnitude and direction.

Back
Top