Major quake in eastern New Britain PNG NOW

  • Thread starter davenn
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Major
In summary, the Eastern New Britain area is being severely rattled over the last week with several aftershocks. A M 7.4 has now hit the same area as can be seen on the seismogram, and is decreasing in magnitude.
  • #1
davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2023 Award
9,602
10,443
Eastern New Britain is being severely rattled over the last week
starting on the 30th April with a M 6.7 and shortly after a M 6.8 followed by numerous aftershocks over the last 5 days.

A M 7.4 has now hit the same area
http://www.sydneystormcity.com/seismograms.htm

as can be seen, the seismo trace is hitting the stops, top to bottom of the displaycheers
Dave
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Saw the news story earlier. btw, the US state Michigan had a M4 yesterday which is pretty rare for the area I think.
 
  • #3
Hi Greg, yes I saw that, a M 4.2 ... one of that size would definitely be pretty rare in that region

There were supposed reports of it being felt in Milwaukee, WI ... seemed a bit doubtful considering the distance
But weird things happen, maybe those that felt it were in high rise buildings ?

Dave
 
  • #4
davenn said:
But weird things happen, maybe those that felt it were in high rise buildings ?
Could be, I am downtown and didn't notice anything
 
  • #5
OK just been putting together a graphic for this latest sequence and the last major event a month ago

201504-05 ongoing events New Britain, PNG.jpg


data courtesy of USGS

cheers
Dave
 
  • #7
hi Stevie, yes a M 5.8

you can still see that on my online seismogram ... link in the first post

follow the time line along from the UTC 0200 and a few minutes after 0230 (~ 0234) the P wave starts

My Mom and Dad live a little inland from Dunedin, They felt it quite wellDave
 
  • #8
USGS ranks it at M7.5 - 130km SSW of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20002bnf#general_summary
2015-05-05 01:44:05 (UTC)

Looks like they have somewhat of a swarm going on:

M5.2 - 124km SSW of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea 2015-05-05 02:40:23 (UTC)
M5.6 - 103km S of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea 2015-05-05 01:58:20 (UTC)
M5.9 - 109km SSW of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea 2015-05-05 01:54:05 (UTC)

Fortunately, they are decreasing in magnitude.

There have been 22 M7.5+ earthquakes recorded in the New Guinea region since 1900. The dominant earthquake mechanisms are thrust and strike slip, associated with the arc-continent collision and the relative motions between numerous local microplates. The largest earthquake in the region was a M8.2 shallow thrust fault event in the northern Papua province of Indonesia that killed 166 people in 1996.

The western portion of the northern Australia plate boundary extends approximately 4800 km from New Guinea to Sumatra and primarily separates Australia from the Eurasia plate, including the Sunda block. This portion is dominantly convergent and includes subduction at the Sunda (Java) trench, and a young arc-continent collision.
 
  • #9
Astronuc said:
USGS ranks it at M7.5 - 130km SSW of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea

ohhhh its gone back up

it started as a 7.5 went down to a 7.4 and now back up again :smile:

Astronuc said:
Looks like they have somewhat of a swarm going on:

M5.2 - 124km SSW of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea 2015-05-05 02:40:23 (UTC)
M5.6 - 103km S of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea 2015-05-05 01:58:20 (UTC)
M5.9 - 109km SSW of Kokopo, Papua New Guinea 2015-05-05 01:54:05 (UTC)

they are just typical aftershocks of a large event
It isn't too often that 2 large events ... the 6.7 and 6.8, late last week would be followed by an even larger event

Dave
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Astronuc said:
Just the planet readjusting.

uh huh

as you can see in that map graphic I did a few posts ago. There was the 7.5 a month ago, to the east, and its aftershock sequence was pretty much contained in the red box. I'm going to have to dig out my historical data and see what is happening seismic gap wise in the region

Dave
 
  • #12
davenn said:
uh huh

as you can see in that map graphic I did a few posts ago. There was the 7.5 a month ago, to the east, and its aftershock sequence was pretty much contained in the red box. I'm going to have to dig out my historical data and see what is happening seismic gap wise in the region

Dave
The plate boundary between the Australia and Pacific plates in the Papua New Guinea region is very active seismically; 36 M 7+ events have occurred within 250 km of the May 5, 2015 earthquake over the past century. Few are known to have caused shaking-related fatalities because of the remoteness of the region, though a M 8.0 earthquake in November 2000 – one of three similarly sized events over a 2-day period – did cause several deaths. The largest nearby earthquake was an M 8.1 event, 150 km to the east-northeast of the May 5, 2015 earthquake, one of two M8+ earthquakes 140 km apart in July 1971. The May, 2015 earthquake is just 10 km to the east-northeast of the November 17, 2000 M 7.8 earthquake, also thrust-faulting event on the plate boundary interface.

The May 5 earthquake has also been preceded by a series of moderate-to-large earthquakes on this portion of the plate boundary over the past several weeks, beginning with a M 7.5 event on March 29, 2015, 110 km to the northeast of the May 5, 2015 earthquake. Between these two large events, 25 other earthquakes of M 5+ have occurred in the same area; including M 6.7 and M 6.8 events just to the northwest of the May 5 earthquake, on April 30 and May 1, respectively.
Ref: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us20002bnf#general_summary

One should be able to search the area between the dates (over the last century) and filter by magnitude.

On another site, I was following the seismic activity along the Sunda trench and intersections of the Australia, Indian, Eurasian and Pacific plants over the last 10 years. Unfortunately that site no longer exists.

I appreciate the 3D volumetric time dependent plots that some folks do that show the progression of swarms around a big event. I don't have the software to do that.
 
  • #13
I was doing a search whilst you were typing
the whole region has been very active for M 7.0+ events

1900-2015 historical events M7.5 plus, New Britian reg PNG1.JPG


Astronuc said:
I appreciate the 3D volumetric time dependent plots that some folks do that show the progression of swarms around a big event. I don't have the software to do that.

Alan Jones ( maybe you know (of) him) does stuff along those lines ... has written some good software for display quakes around the world

Dave
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I hate the way the forum software compresses the pix so much :(
turns them to crap to try and read
 

Related to Major quake in eastern New Britain PNG NOW

1. What caused the major quake in eastern New Britain PNG?

The major quake in eastern New Britain PNG was caused by tectonic plate movement. This region is known for its high seismic activity due to its location on the Pacific Ring of Fire.

2. How strong was the quake and what was its impact?

The quake was recorded as a magnitude 7.5 and was considered a major earthquake. It caused significant damage to buildings, roads, and infrastructure in the affected areas. There were also reports of landslides and tsunamis triggered by the quake.

3. Was there any warning before the quake?

No, there was no specific warning for this particular quake. However, the region is closely monitored by seismologists and any changes in seismic activity are regularly reported.

4. Are there any ongoing aftershocks?

Yes, there have been several aftershocks recorded following the major quake. Aftershocks are common after a large earthquake and can continue for weeks or months after the initial event.

5. Is there a possibility of more quakes in the area?

Yes, there is always a possibility of more quakes in this region due to its location on the Pacific Ring of Fire. Scientists continue to monitor the area and provide updates on any changes in seismic activity.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top