Mapping wave forms to sphere, does wave form y=0 have a reflection?

In summary, zero does not have an inverse and y=0 does not have an inverse. The question of whether the wave form y=0 for all x has an inverse raises the consideration of reflection about the x-axis. Further research is needed to determine if zero has reflection.
  • #1
bahamagreen
1,014
52
TL;DR Summary
Continuous mapping of all continuous wave forms to the surface of a sphere
Zero does not have an inverse.
And y=0 does not have an inverse.
Does the wave form y=0 for all x have an inverse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What conditions should an inverse of a 'wave form' fulfil ?
:wideeyed:

##\ ##
 
  • #3
BvU said:
What conditions should an inverse of a 'wave form' fulfil ?
:wideeyed:

##\ ##
My first thought is inverse polarity, but if the inverse wave form comprises -y values, any y=0 wouldn't have an inverse -y, so maybe the inverse wave form would not be strictly continuous? That seems asymmetric with respect to inversion...

edit-- I'm using the wrong term, inversion swaps the range and domain, what I am asking about is reflection about the x axis... y -> -y
This is in the context of antipodean pairs on the sphere
 
Last edited:
  • #4
More checking, but it looks like zero does have reflection...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top